000153188 001__ 153188
000153188 005__ 20251017144651.0
000153188 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1016/j.vas.2025.100442
000153188 0248_ $$2sideral$$a143649
000153188 037__ $$aART-2025-143649
000153188 041__ $$aeng
000153188 100__ $$aSánchez-Tarifa, E.
000153188 245__ $$aPost-vaccination evaluation of an erysipelas/parvovirus bivalent vaccine administered to sows during lactation on follicular development and piglet growth
000153188 260__ $$c2025
000153188 5060_ $$aAccess copy available to the general public$$fUnrestricted
000153188 5203_ $$aVaccines against Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae (ER) and porcine parvovirus (PPV) are employed in sow farms worldwide. This study evaluated the impact of administering a bivalent ER/PPV vaccine during lactation. Multiparous sows (n = 83) of two different farms (A (herd size 900 sows) and B (1000 sows)) were allocated in two different groups: 1) sows inoculated with saline solution (non-vaccinated group); 2) sows inoculated with the bivalent vaccine against ER/PPV (vaccinated group). The injections were administered at ∼11 days of lactation. The study was conducted in four different experiments: the first experiment, evaluating the female genital tract (uterus and ovary) and follicle development, was performed in culled sows (n = 19) of Farm A the day after weaning (∼24 days). The remaining experiments, which examined internal temperature, offspring growth, and sow feed intake, were conducted at Farm B (n = 64). The results of follicle populations, showed a greater frequency of large follicles in non-vaccinated compared to vaccinated sows was observed (p < 0.001). The final weight of the piglets and their weight gain were higher in the non-vaccinated group (p ≤ 0.05). A statistical trend was also observed in the average weight gain of piglets. No differences were observed regarding sow´s rectal temperature between groups around the period of injection but the vaccinated group consumed less sow feed on the day of injection (p = 0.016). In conclusion, the administration of this vaccine against ER/PPV during the lactation period had a negative impact on follicle development, sow feed intake, and offspring weight gain and final weight.
000153188 540__ $$9info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess$$aby$$uhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.es
000153188 655_4 $$ainfo:eu-repo/semantics/article$$vinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
000153188 700__ $$aGarcía-Vázquez, FA.
000153188 700__ $$aVela, A.
000153188 700__ $$aSanjoaquín, L.
000153188 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0001-6964-7011$$aFalceto, MV.$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000153188 700__ $$aFernández-Fontelo, A.
000153188 700__ $$aGómez-Duran, O.
000153188 700__ $$aAlonso, C.
000153188 700__ $$aHernández-Caravaca, I.
000153188 7102_ $$11009$$2617$$aUniversidad de Zaragoza$$bDpto. Patología Animal$$cÁrea Medicina y Cirugía Animal
000153188 773__ $$g28 (2025), 100442 [8 pp.]$$tVeterinary and Animal Science$$x2451-943X
000153188 8564_ $$s2658135$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/153188/files/texto_completo.pdf$$yVersión publicada
000153188 8564_ $$s2379836$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/153188/files/texto_completo.jpg?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yVersión publicada
000153188 909CO $$ooai:zaguan.unizar.es:153188$$particulos$$pdriver
000153188 951__ $$a2025-10-17-14:36:28
000153188 980__ $$aARTICLE