<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection>
<dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:invenio="http://invenio-software.org/elements/1.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><dc:identifier>doi:10.1016/j.vas.2025.100442</dc:identifier><dc:language>eng</dc:language><dc:creator>Sánchez-Tarifa, E.</dc:creator><dc:creator>García-Vázquez, FA.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Vela, A.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Sanjoaquín, L.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Falceto, MV.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Fernández-Fontelo, A.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Gómez-Duran, O.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Alonso, C.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Hernández-Caravaca, I.</dc:creator><dc:title>Post-vaccination evaluation of an erysipelas/parvovirus bivalent vaccine administered to sows during lactation on follicular development and piglet growth</dc:title><dc:identifier>ART-2025-143649</dc:identifier><dc:description>Vaccines against Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae (ER) and porcine parvovirus (PPV) are employed in sow farms worldwide. This study evaluated the impact of administering a bivalent ER/PPV vaccine during lactation. Multiparous sows (n = 83) of two different farms (A (herd size 900 sows) and B (1000 sows)) were allocated in two different groups: 1) sows inoculated with saline solution (non-vaccinated group); 2) sows inoculated with the bivalent vaccine against ER/PPV (vaccinated group). The injections were administered at ∼11 days of lactation. The study was conducted in four different experiments: the first experiment, evaluating the female genital tract (uterus and ovary) and follicle development, was performed in culled sows (n = 19) of Farm A the day after weaning (∼24 days). The remaining experiments, which examined internal temperature, offspring growth, and sow feed intake, were conducted at Farm B (n = 64). The results of follicle populations, showed a greater frequency of large follicles in non-vaccinated compared to vaccinated sows was observed (p &lt; 0.001). The final weight of the piglets and their weight gain were higher in the non-vaccinated group (p ≤ 0.05). A statistical trend was also observed in the average weight gain of piglets. No differences were observed regarding sow´s rectal temperature between groups around the period of injection but the vaccinated group consumed less sow feed on the day of injection (p = 0.016). In conclusion, the administration of this vaccine against ER/PPV during the lactation period had a negative impact on follicle development, sow feed intake, and offspring weight gain and final weight.</dc:description><dc:date>2025</dc:date><dc:source>http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/153188</dc:source><dc:doi>10.1016/j.vas.2025.100442</dc:doi><dc:identifier>http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/153188</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>oai:zaguan.unizar.es:153188</dc:identifier><dc:identifier.citation>Veterinary and Animal Science 28 (2025), 100442 [8 pp.]</dc:identifier.citation><dc:rights>by</dc:rights><dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.es</dc:rights><dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights></dc:dc>

</collection>