<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection>
<dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:invenio="http://invenio-software.org/elements/1.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><dc:identifier>doi:10.1007/s10722-019-00828-z</dc:identifier><dc:language>eng</dc:language><dc:creator>Díaz, A.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Taberner, A.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Vilaplana, L.</dc:creator><dc:title>The emergence of a new weed in maize plantations: characterization and genetic structure using microsatellite markers</dc:title><dc:identifier>ART-2020-116842</dc:identifier><dc:description>The objective of this work was to assess the genetic variability and structure of a new weed in Spanish maize fields, and investigate its geographical patterns using 17 microsatellites. Commercial maize varieties (C), maize-like weeds (MLW), putative hybrids with C (WCH), and teosintes (Tm: Zea mays ssp. mexicana and Tp: Z. mays ssp. parviglumis) were analyzed. The weed genetic diversity (MLW and WCH: 0.52) was the lowest (C: 0.59, Tm: 0.66, and Tp: 0.71). Weeds (0.21) and teosintes (Tm: 0.27, Tp: 0.34) showed positive values for the inbreeding coefficient (FIS), which agrees with their low values for the observed heterozygosity (HO), common in wild species; whereas C exhibited a negative FIS value (- 0.06, excess of heterozygous), common in domesticated species. Major clustering agreed with the different types of samples, even if some of the most hybridized weeds branched with the C cluster. Within the weeds, an evident tendency to group together depending on their geographical origin was perceived. Structure analyses confirmed the contribution of C to the genome of those weeds with the highest degree of hybridization. Consistently, the genetic variation (FST) was not negligible only when the teosintes were compared to the C group. Most of the molecular variance occurred within populations (51.83%) and not among populations (10.09%), with the highest value (32.33%) being found within the weed population. These new weeds seem to have a complex origin. Even if they are related to both, C and teosintes (Tm and Tp), they form an unidentified and genetically distinct group (FST: 0.13).</dc:description><dc:date>2020</dc:date><dc:source>http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/153631</dc:source><dc:doi>10.1007/s10722-019-00828-z</dc:doi><dc:identifier>http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/153631</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>oai:zaguan.unizar.es:153631</dc:identifier><dc:relation>info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/INIA/ERTA-2014-00011-C02</dc:relation><dc:identifier.citation>GENETIC RESOURCES AND CROP EVOLUTION 67 (2020), 225-239</dc:identifier.citation><dc:rights>by</dc:rights><dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.es</dc:rights><dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights></dc:dc>

</collection>