000160910 001__ 160910
000160910 005__ 20251017144623.0
000160910 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.34739/fci.2021.02.06
000160910 0248_ $$2sideral$$a144005
000160910 037__ $$aART-2021-144005
000160910 041__ $$aeng
000160910 100__ $$0(orcid)0000-0001-7933-8861$$aPérez Chico, David$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000160910 245__ $$a“My tongue swore but my heart did not”: vindicating ordinary language philosophy against the procustean bed of scientism in the philosophy of language
000160910 260__ $$c2021
000160910 5060_ $$aAccess copy available to the general public$$fUnrestricted
000160910 5203_ $$aOften vilified, if not outright rejected, ordinary language philosophy has been sustained, from its very beginnings, due to the farne of authors such as Austin and the later Wittgenstein; but not, however, on its own merits. These, w hen recognized, are branded as either constituting a bad philosophy of language, or simply a bad philosophy altogether. Thus, same charitable interpretations have tried to domesticate its methods to make it compatible with a mare orthodox philosophy of language. Very gradually, however, this situation is changing, largely thanks to the influence that Stanley Cavell's philosophy is having on several generations of philosophers. The main thing is to convince ourselves that ordinary language philosophy is not strictly speaking a philosophy of language. It is a philosophy that proceeds from the ordinary and pays attention to the importance that the ordinary has for philosophy. We will, in the course of this article, analyze the criticisms and attempts to domesticate ordinary language philosophy and will anticipate Cavell's defense of the ordinary language philosophy as practiced by Austin and Ryle in Cavell's inheritance of the farmer.
000160910 536__ $$9info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/MICINN/RTI2018-098254-B-I00$$9info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/MINECO/PGC2018-093982-B-I00
000160910 540__ $$9info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess$$aby-nc-nd$$uhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.es
000160910 655_4 $$ainfo:eu-repo/semantics/article$$vinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
000160910 7102_ $$15012$$2585$$aUniversidad de Zaragoza$$bUnidad Predepartam. Filosofía$$cÁrea Lógica y Filosof.Ciencia
000160910 773__ $$g2 (2021), 74-98$$pForum Contem. Issues Lang. Lit.$$tForum for Contemporary Issues and Literature$$x2391-9426
000160910 8564_ $$s7818175$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/160910/files/texto_completo.pdf$$yVersión publicada
000160910 8564_ $$s1756684$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/160910/files/texto_completo.jpg?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yVersión publicada
000160910 909CO $$ooai:zaguan.unizar.es:160910$$particulos$$pdriver
000160910 951__ $$a2025-10-17-14:22:40
000160910 980__ $$aARTICLE