000161063 001__ 161063
000161063 005__ 20251017144605.0
000161063 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.126004
000161063 0248_ $$2sideral$$a144297
000161063 037__ $$aART-2025-144297
000161063 041__ $$aeng
000161063 100__ $$aSoler-Navarro, Diego J.$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000161063 245__ $$aEnvironmental strategies increase the resilience of extensive livestock systems to adverse climate conditions
000161063 260__ $$c2025
000161063 5060_ $$aAccess copy available to the general public$$fUnrestricted
000161063 5203_ $$aThis study presents an agent-based model to assess the resilience and ecological, economic, and social sustainability of three extensive livestock system archetypes: subsistence, commercial, and environmental. Subsistence focuses on traditional practices, commercial prioritizes profit, and environmental emphasizes resource conservation and animal welfare. The model simulates livestock dynamics under two grazing strategies (free and rotational grazing) under thirty climate-driven primary productivity change scenarios as a proxy to explore the potential long-term and persistent impacts of climate change. Results indicate that all archetypes reach a collapse threshold under extreme climate conditions, and that no single strategy performs best under all circumstances. The environmental performs best under adverse but non-critical conditions, especially in ecological sustainability; the subsistence is the most vulnerable and the commercial excels in economic and social sustainability under favorable conditions. Under normal or favorable climate-driven conditions, tradeoffs between sustainability dimensions emerge. Rotational grazing improves ecological sustainability, but reduces economic and social performance. Strategies to reduce tradeoffs are essential to improve the ecological footprint of commercial systems and the economic viability of environmental systems under changing climates. This model has the potential to be transferable and adaptable to a wide range of extensive livestock systems, providing a valuable tool for research and policy aimed at building climate-resilient pastoral systems.
000161063 536__ $$9info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/MICINN/PID2019-104020RA-I00
000161063 540__ $$9info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess$$aby-nc$$uhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/deed.es
000161063 655_4 $$ainfo:eu-repo/semantics/article$$vinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
000161063 700__ $$aTenza-Peral, Alicia$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000161063 700__ $$aJanssen, Marco A.
000161063 700__ $$aGiménez, Andrés
000161063 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0003-0715-0418$$aPérez-Ibarra, Irene$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000161063 7102_ $$15011$$2235$$aUniversidad de Zaragoza$$bDpto. CC.Agrar.y Medio Natural$$cÁrea Econom.Sociol.Polit.Agra.
000161063 773__ $$g388 (2025), 126004 [10 pp.]$$pJ. environ. manag.$$tJournal of environmental management$$x0301-4797
000161063 8564_ $$s3762755$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/161063/files/texto_completo.pdf$$yVersión publicada
000161063 8564_ $$s2547475$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/161063/files/texto_completo.jpg?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yVersión publicada
000161063 909CO $$ooai:zaguan.unizar.es:161063$$particulos$$pdriver
000161063 951__ $$a2025-10-17-14:15:07
000161063 980__ $$aARTICLE