000161801 001__ 161801
000161801 005__ 20251017144644.0
000161801 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1484/J.EUPHR.5.144619
000161801 0248_ $$2sideral$$a144460
000161801 037__ $$aART-2024-144460
000161801 041__ $$aspa
000161801 100__ $$0(orcid)0000-0001-6307-0354$$aVergara Recreo, Silvia$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000161801 245__ $$aRumor, invectiva e irreligiosidad: el asesinato de Nicodemo en la oratoria (anti)demosténica
000161801 260__ $$c2024
000161801 5060_ $$aAccess copy available to the general public$$fUnrestricted
000161801 5203_ $$aThis paper aims to study the overlapping of irreligious vocabulary, rhetoric, and a rumour widely used against Demosthenes – his alleged cooperation in the murder of Nicodemus. Our analysis focuses on how rumours were suitable for humiliating the opponent and how their combination with irreligious notions turned them into a powerful device for invective. Bearing this in mind, we consider four different variants of this argument, provided by Demosthenes, Aeschines, and Dinarchus.
000161801 536__ $$9info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/DGA-FEDER/H17-23R
000161801 540__ $$9info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess$$aby-nc-nd$$uhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.es
000161801 592__ $$a0.101$$b2024
000161801 593__ $$aLinguistics and Language$$c2024$$dQ4
000161801 593__ $$aClassics$$c2024$$dQ4
000161801 655_4 $$ainfo:eu-repo/semantics/article$$vinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
000161801 7102_ $$13000$$2340$$aUniversidad de Zaragoza$$bDpto. Ciencias de la Antigüed.$$cÁrea Filología Griega
000161801 773__ $$g52 (2024), 47-61$$pEuphrosyne$$tEuphrosyne$$x0870-0133
000161801 8564_ $$s565472$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/161801/files/texto_completo.pdf$$yVersión publicada
000161801 8564_ $$s999375$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/161801/files/texto_completo.jpg?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yVersión publicada
000161801 909CO $$ooai:zaguan.unizar.es:161801$$particulos$$pdriver
000161801 951__ $$a2025-10-17-14:33:09
000161801 980__ $$aARTICLE