000162492 001__ 162492
000162492 005__ 20251017144605.0
000162492 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1016/j.archger.2020.104332
000162492 0248_ $$2sideral$$a122352
000162492 037__ $$aART-2021-122352
000162492 041__ $$aeng
000162492 100__ $$0(orcid)0000-0002-0061-3312$$aGómez-Soria, I.$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000162492 245__ $$aEfficacy of cognitive intervention programs in amnesic mild cognitive impairment: A systematic review
000162492 260__ $$c2021
000162492 5060_ $$aAccess copy available to the general public$$fUnrestricted
000162492 5203_ $$aBackground:: Amnesic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) is considered a prodromal stage of Alzheimer''s disease. Given the absence of an effective pharmacological treatment for aMCI, increasing numbers of studies are attempting to understand how cognitive interventions could benefit aMCI patients. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the current evidence regarding the efficacy on cognition of cognitive intervention programs in older adults with aMCI.
Methods:: We searched for randomized controlled trials and clinical trials published until March 2020 on PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, SCOPUS, and OTseeker. A total of 454 works were identified and 7 studies that met the inclusion criteria, were included in this review. PRISMA guidelines were followed and PEDro scale was included for the measurement of the quality of the selected studies.
Results:: Cognitive interventions showed positive effects on cognition. Cognitive training programs considerably enhanced the Mini Mental State Examination scores. However, no relevant differences in global cognition were found using other assessment tools as DRS-2 or ADAS-Cog Scale. Cognitive training and cognitive rehabilitation programs seemed to improve several cognitive domains as memory, language or executive function in aMCI patients in both post-training and at follow-up analysis.
Conclusions:: Our findings support that cognitive interventions can be an effective option for people with aMCI. Cognitive interventions improved global cognitive function post-intervention, but also seemed to enhance some cognitive domains post-intervention and at follow-up. However, more studies are needed to analyze the potential benefits of cognitive intervention on aMCI.
000162492 540__ $$9info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess$$aby-nc-nd$$uhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.es
000162492 590__ $$a4.163$$b2021
000162492 591__ $$aGERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY$$b27 / 54 = 0.5$$c2021$$dQ2$$eT2
000162492 592__ $$a0.953$$b2021
000162492 593__ $$aGeriatrics and Gerontology$$c2021$$dQ1
000162492 593__ $$aHealth (social science)$$c2021$$dQ1
000162492 593__ $$aGerontology$$c2021$$dQ1
000162492 594__ $$a5.3$$b2021
000162492 655_4 $$ainfo:eu-repo/semantics/review$$vinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
000162492 700__ $$aPeralta-Marrupe, P.$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000162492 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0002-4307-796X$$aCalatayud-Sanz, E.$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000162492 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0002-5797-3909$$aLatorre, E.$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000162492 7102_ $$11006$$2413$$aUniversidad de Zaragoza$$bDpto. Fisiatría y Enfermería$$cÁrea Fisioterapia
000162492 7102_ $$11002$$2050$$aUniversidad de Zaragoza$$bDpto. Bioq.Biolog.Mol. Celular$$cÁrea Biología Celular
000162492 773__ $$g94 (2021), 104332 [10 pp.]$$pArch. gerontol. geriatr.$$tARCHIVES OF GERONTOLOGY AND GERIATRICS$$x0167-4943
000162492 8564_ $$s1638154$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/162492/files/texto_completo.pdf$$yPostprint
000162492 8564_ $$s599097$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/162492/files/texto_completo.jpg?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yPostprint
000162492 909CO $$ooai:zaguan.unizar.es:162492$$particulos$$pdriver
000162492 951__ $$a2025-10-17-14:14:59
000162492 980__ $$aARTICLE