000162643 001__ 162643
000162643 005__ 20251017144636.0
000162643 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3382251
000162643 0248_ $$2sideral$$a138135
000162643 037__ $$aART-2024-138135
000162643 041__ $$aeng
000162643 100__ $$aPonce, David
000162643 245__ $$aAugmented reality to assess short-term spatial memory: a comparative study of olfactory, visual, and tactile stimuli
000162643 260__ $$c2024
000162643 5060_ $$aAccess copy available to the general public$$fUnrestricted
000162643 5203_ $$aThis work presents an Augmented Reality application based on SLAM (Simultaneous Localization and Mapping) for the assessment of spatial memory involving olfactory stimuli. A study was carried with twenty-five adults. The participants of the study completed two phases (a learning phase and an evaluation phase). In the learning phase, the participants physically walk around a real environment and have to remember the location of olfactory stimuli. In the evaluation phase, the participants have to remember the location of olfactory stimuli learned in the previous phase. The data of this study is compared with those obtained in a previous study involving visual and tactile stimuli (N = 47). The results indicate that the olfactory stimuli did not offer significant differences with respect to the visual stimuli for the correct placement of stimuli and the number of attempts in the evaluation phase. The olfactory stimuli had better results compared to the tactile stimuli for the correct placement of the stimuli in the evaluation phase and there was a significantly lower number of attempts. The time required in the learning and evaluation phases was greater for the olfactory stimuli compared to the other two stimuli, which is justified by the physical and mechanical characteristics of each of the stimuli. The results show that this type of memory task for the olfactory stimuli is independent of gender and age. All of these results suggest that olfactory stimuli are valid stimuli for assessing the memorization of olfactory-spatial associations and are similar to the level of visual stimuli and better than tactile stimuli.
000162643 540__ $$9info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess$$aby$$uhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.es
000162643 592__ $$a0.849$$b2024
000162643 590__ $$a3.6$$b2024
000162643 591__ $$aCOMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS$$b93 / 258 = 0.36$$c2024$$dQ2$$eT2
000162643 591__ $$aTELECOMMUNICATIONS$$b50 / 120 = 0.417$$c2024$$dQ2$$eT2
000162643 591__ $$aENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC$$b128 / 366 = 0.35$$c2024$$dQ2$$eT2
000162643 593__ $$aComputer Science (miscellaneous)$$c2024$$dQ1
000162643 593__ $$aEngineering (miscellaneous)$$c2024$$dQ1
000162643 593__ $$aMaterials Science (miscellaneous)$$c2024$$dQ2
000162643 655_4 $$ainfo:eu-repo/semantics/article$$vinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
000162643 700__ $$aTorres, Celia
000162643 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0002-4249-602X$$aMendez-Lopez, Magdalena$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000162643 700__ $$aMolla, Ramon
000162643 700__ $$aJuan, M.-Carmen
000162643 7102_ $$14009$$2725$$aUniversidad de Zaragoza$$bDpto. Psicología y Sociología$$cÁrea Psicobiología
000162643 773__ $$g12 (2024), 47041-47056$$pIEEE Access$$tIEEE Access$$x2169-3536
000162643 8564_ $$s2686196$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/162643/files/texto_completo.pdf$$yVersión publicada
000162643 8564_ $$s2612143$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/162643/files/texto_completo.jpg?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yVersión publicada
000162643 909CO $$ooai:zaguan.unizar.es:162643$$particulos$$pdriver
000162643 951__ $$a2025-10-17-14:29:15
000162643 980__ $$aARTICLE