000162649 001__ 162649
000162649 005__ 20251017144645.0
000162649 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.3390/bs15070868
000162649 0248_ $$2sideral$$a145173
000162649 037__ $$aART-2025-145173
000162649 041__ $$aeng
000162649 100__ $$aSosa, Miguel Zacarías Pérez
000162649 245__ $$aConcurrent Validity of Digital Measures of Psychological Dimensions Associated with Suicidality Using AuxiliApp
000162649 260__ $$c2025
000162649 5060_ $$aAccess copy available to the general public$$fUnrestricted
000162649 5203_ $$aSuicide is a major public health concern, and accurate risk assessment is essential for prevention. Slider-format questions offer a quick, intuitive, and accessible method to evaluate suicide-related dimensions. This study examines the reliability of slider-based items compared to standardized psychometric instruments when delivered via a mobile app. A total of 299 university students completed a digital self-report questionnaire using the AuxiliApp mobile platform. Participants answered validated scales assessing depression, psychological pain, suicidal ideation, anger, impulsivity, loneliness, and reasons for living, each presented in both traditional Likert and novel slider formats. Pearson correlations were used to evaluate the relationship between traditional and slider-based scores. All correlations were statistically significant (p < 0.001). Moderate correlations were found in most domains, including depression, psychological pain, suicidal ideation, loneliness, and key aspects of impulsivity and anger. Lower correlations appeared in subscales related to anger control and protective beliefs against suicide. Slider-based items demonstrated acceptable psychometric equivalence and concurrent validity compared to traditional scales. Their brevity and compatibility with mobile devices support their use in telehealth and digital mental health screening. While not a replacement for clinical evaluation, they may facilitate early detection and ongoing monitoring in at-risk populations.
000162649 540__ $$9info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess$$aby$$uhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.es
000162649 655_4 $$ainfo:eu-repo/semantics/article$$vinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
000162649 700__ $$ade-la-Vega-Sánchez, Diego
000162649 700__ $$aSanz-Gómez, Sergio
000162649 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0002-0633-2810$$aAlacreu-Crespo, Adrián$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000162649 700__ $$aMoreno-Gea, Pedro
000162649 700__ $$aSaiz, Pilar A.
000162649 700__ $$aSeoane Rey, Julio
000162649 700__ $$aGiner, José
000162649 700__ $$aGiner, Lucas
000162649 7102_ $$14009$$2680$$aUniversidad de Zaragoza$$bDpto. Psicología y Sociología$$cÁrea Person.Eval.Trat.Psicoló.
000162649 773__ $$g15, 7 (2025), 868 [17 pp.]$$tBehavioral Sciences$$x2076-328X
000162649 8564_ $$s620721$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/162649/files/texto_completo.pdf$$yVersión publicada
000162649 8564_ $$s2518220$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/162649/files/texto_completo.jpg?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yVersión publicada
000162649 909CO $$ooai:zaguan.unizar.es:162649$$particulos$$pdriver
000162649 951__ $$a2025-10-17-14:33:36
000162649 980__ $$aARTICLE