<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection>
<dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:invenio="http://invenio-software.org/elements/1.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/s12873-023-00871-1</dc:identifier><dc:language>eng</dc:language><dc:creator>Yánez Benítez, Carlos</dc:creator><dc:creator>Lorente-Aznar, Teófilo</dc:creator><dc:creator>Labaka, Idurre</dc:creator><dc:creator>Ribeiro Jr, Marcelo A. F.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Viteri, Yosu</dc:creator><dc:creator>Morishita, Koji</dc:creator><dc:creator>Baselga, Marta</dc:creator><dc:creator>Güemes, Antonio</dc:creator><dc:title>Tourniquet self-application assessment in cold weather conditions</dc:title><dc:identifier>ART-2023-145210</dc:identifier><dc:description>Background: Our study aimed to assess the ability of nonmedical civilians to self-apply extremity tourniquets in cold weather conditions while wearing insulating technical clothing after receiving basic training.
Methods: A field study was conducted among 37 voluntary participants of an expedition party to the Spanish Antarctic base. The researchers assessed the participant’s ability to self-apply five commercial extremity tourniquets (CAT, OMNA, RMT, SWAT-T, and RATS) over cold-weather clothing and their achieved effectiveness for vascular occlusion. Upper extremity self-application was performed with a single-handed technique (OHT), and lower extremity applying a two-handed technique (THT). Perceptions of self-application ease mean values ± standard deviation (SD) were compared by applying a 5% statistical significance threshold. Frequency count determined tourniquet preference.
Results: All the tested ETs, except the SWAT-T, were properly self-applied with an OHT, resulting in effective vascular occlusion in the upper extremity. The five devices tested were self-applied correctly in the lower extremities using THT. The ratcheting marine-designed OMNA ranked the highest for application easiness on both the upper and lower extremities, and the windlass CAT model was the preferred device by most participants.
Conclusions: Civilian extremity tourniquet self-application on both upper and lower extremities can be accomplished in cold weather conditions despite using cold-weather gloves and technical clothing after receiving brief training. The ratcheting marine-designed OMNA ranked the highest for application ease, and the windlass CAT model was the preferred device.</dc:description><dc:date>2023</dc:date><dc:source>http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/162661</dc:source><dc:doi>10.1186/s12873-023-00871-1</dc:doi><dc:identifier>http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/162661</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>oai:zaguan.unizar.es:162661</dc:identifier><dc:identifier.citation>BMC Emergency Medicine 23 (2023), 101 [8 pp.]</dc:identifier.citation><dc:rights>by</dc:rights><dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.es</dc:rights><dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights></dc:dc>

</collection>