<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection>
<dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:invenio="http://invenio-software.org/elements/1.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><dc:identifier>doi:10.1080/10503307.2025.2541707</dc:identifier><dc:language>eng</dc:language><dc:creator>Martínez-García, Laura</dc:creator><dc:creator>Schaeuffele, Carmen</dc:creator><dc:creator>Peris-Baquero, Óscar</dc:creator><dc:creator>Torres Alfosea, María Ángeles</dc:creator><dc:creator>Osma, Jorge</dc:creator><dc:title>Acceptability and preliminary effectiveness of the Unified Protocol in blended format in the Spanish public mental health system: Results from a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial</dc:title><dc:identifier>ART-2025-145249</dc:identifier><dc:description>Objective: This study evaluated the acceptability and preliminary effectiveness of the UP in blended format, combining face-to-face UP sessions with the use of the UP-App, versus Treatment as Usual (TAU) for treating Emotional disorders (ED) in Spanish specialized mental health units. Methods: A total of 76 adults presenting a diagnosis of ED were randomly assigned to UP + APP (n = 40) or TAU (n = 36) and completed self-report questionnaires at baseline, 3 and 6 months after treatment onset. Results: Improvements in both conditions for ODSIS (b = −2.84; T = −2.36), depressed mood (b = −6.85; T = 0.01), and the describing facet of mindfulness were found (b = 4.01; T = 2.31). No significant differences were found between both conditions in terms of treatment outcomes or in the Time∗Condition interaction. However, engagement with the UPApp understood as number of completed UP-App modules was related to improvements in emotion regulation and the acting with awareness facet of mindfulness, especially at 6 months, suggesting a possible time-dependent effect and UPApp modules completed. The UP-App showed good usability at 3 months (76.47) and excellent at 6 months (83.96),
but low adherence (7.5% completers). Satisfaction with the treatment was similar in both conditions. Conclusions: This study suggests that the UP + APP may be as effective as TAU for ED in the SNHS. However, high dropout rates and low adherence to the UP-App constrain these results. Future research should explore a modified implementation format of the UP + APP ensuring a greater presence of the therapist, as well as an updated version of the UP-App incorporating feedback from the current study and new functionalities, in an RCT with a larger sample, as well as comparing standard UP vs UP + APP to determine the unique contribution of the UP-App on effectiveness,
adherence, and user experience with UP.</dc:description><dc:date>2025</dc:date><dc:source>http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/162701</dc:source><dc:doi>10.1080/10503307.2025.2541707</dc:doi><dc:identifier>http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/162701</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>oai:zaguan.unizar.es:162701</dc:identifier><dc:relation>info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/DGA/S31-23R</dc:relation><dc:relation>info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/ISCIII-FEDER/PI20-00697</dc:relation><dc:identifier.citation>PSYCHOTHERAPY RESEARCH (2025), [18 pp.]</dc:identifier.citation><dc:rights>All rights reserved</dc:rights><dc:rights>http://www.europeana.eu/rights/rr-f/</dc:rights><dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess</dc:rights></dc:dc>

</collection>