<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection>
<dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:invenio="http://invenio-software.org/elements/1.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><dc:identifier>doi:10.1016/j.energy.2025.138183</dc:identifier><dc:language>eng</dc:language><dc:creator>Pascual, S.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Barón, C.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Katla, D.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Skorek-Osikowska, A.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Wecel, D.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Bailera, M.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Legaz, J.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Peña, B.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Lisbona, P.</dc:creator><dc:title>Pilot-plant experimental tests and kinetic model validation of Ru-based catalytic methanation: assessment of operating pressure and filler material on carbon conversion</dc:title><dc:identifier>ART-2025-145421</dc:identifier><dc:description>The production of synthetic methane is crucial for the energy transition in hard-to-electrify industries. This study assesses the reactor filler (Al2O3 and SiC) and operating pressure (1 and 4 bar) effects on methane performance of a commercial Ru-Al2O3 catalyst. Three catalytic methanation parameters are tested over a wide range: temperatures (200–450 °C), gas hourly space velocities (8000–120,000 h−1), and H2/CO2 molar ratios (3.5–5.5). Experiments are conducted in two pilot plants located at the Universidad de Zaragoza and the Silesian University of Technology. Results demonstrate a high level of reproducibility between the two pilot plants, using Al2O3 filler at 1 bar. Additionally, a kinetic model is validated with experimental measurements, showing an error margin of ±5 % between the model and experimental data. Regarding the effects of operational pressure and reactor filler, the best carbon conversion results are obtained with Al2O3 filler at 4 bar (up to 98 %). For both reactors, a 5 % reduction in carbon conversion is observed at 450 °C for SiC filler. Methane selectivity remains above 99 % in all cases, except for SiC filler at 1 bar (90 %). However, SiC filler shows better thermal diffusion, facilitating operational control.</dc:description><dc:date>2025</dc:date><dc:source>http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/162888</dc:source><dc:doi>10.1016/j.energy.2025.138183</dc:doi><dc:identifier>http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/162888</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>oai:zaguan.unizar.es:162888</dc:identifier><dc:relation>info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/AEI/RYC2022-038283-I</dc:relation><dc:relation>info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/DGA/T46-17R</dc:relation><dc:relation>info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/MCIU/FPU23-00073</dc:relation><dc:relation>info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/MICINN/PID2021-126164OB-I00</dc:relation><dc:identifier.citation>Energy 335 (2025), 138183 [15 pp.]</dc:identifier.citation><dc:rights>by-nc-nd</dc:rights><dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.es</dc:rights><dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights></dc:dc>

</collection>