<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection>
<dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:invenio="http://invenio-software.org/elements/1.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><dc:identifier>doi:10.1016/j.vas.2025.100505</dc:identifier><dc:language>eng</dc:language><dc:creator>Falceto, María Victoria</dc:creator><dc:creator>Reyero, David</dc:creator><dc:creator>Tejedor, María Teresa</dc:creator><dc:creator>Renaud, Paul</dc:creator><dc:creator>Mateu, Ana</dc:creator><dc:creator>Lafuente, Antonio</dc:creator><dc:creator>Bonastre, Cristina</dc:creator><dc:creator>Laborda, Alicia</dc:creator><dc:creator>Garrido, Ana Maria</dc:creator><dc:creator>Mitjana, Olga</dc:creator><dc:title>Role of triptorelin and single fixed-time artificial insemination on productive and reproductive performance of hyperprolific sows</dc:title><dc:identifier>ART-2025-145435</dc:identifier><dc:description>Single fixed-time artificial insemination (SFTAI) provides a streamlined approach to improving reproductive management. We evaluated the impact of incorporating triptorelin acetate (GnRH agonist) into a SFTAI protocol on a commercial farm. Hyperprolific sows not in estrus by day 4 post-weaning were randomly assigned to two groups. Group-1 (G1; n = 243) received no triptorelin treatment and daily post-cervical artificial inseminations (PCAI) based on estrus detection (2.59±0.034 inseminations/sow). Group-2 (G2; n = 249) received a single intravaginal dose of triptorelin (0.2 mg) at 96 ± 2 h post-weaning, then one PCAI 22 ± 2 h later. No significant differences (P &gt; 0.05) between groups in conception rate (G1: 98.8 %; G2: 97.6 %), farrowing rate (G1:95.1 %; G2: 94.4 %) or litter characteristics (total born, live-, stillborn and mummified piglets). Both groups showed similar delivery batch durations (P = 0.414). Distribution of deliveries during the delivery period was similar (P = 0.455). Induction of labor was need more frequently in G1 (P &lt; 0.001). G2 had a higher proportion of sows with shorter gestations (112–115 days: 166/235, 70.6 %) compared to G1 (112–115 days: 82/231; 35.5 %, P &lt; 0.001). A significantly higher proportion of G2 piglets received longer lactation (27 - 33 days) compared to G1 (2210/3023=73.1 % vs 2774/4395=63.1 %; P = 0.032). G1 had a higher proportion of low-weight piglets (≤4.0 kg; 716/43950= 16.3 % vs.435/3023= 14.4 %; while G2 had more heavy piglets (≥6.5 kg; 1228/3023=40.5 % vs.1675/4395= 38.1 %) (P = 0.027). Observed differences in lactation length could be responsible for these weaning weight differences, rather than triptorelin treatment itself. This protocol did not worsen productive and reproductive performances.</dc:description><dc:date>2025</dc:date><dc:source>http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/162950</dc:source><dc:doi>10.1016/j.vas.2025.100505</dc:doi><dc:identifier>http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/162950</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>oai:zaguan.unizar.es:162950</dc:identifier><dc:identifier.citation>Veterinary and Animal Science 30 (2025), 100505 [10 pp.]</dc:identifier.citation><dc:rights>by-nc-nd</dc:rights><dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.es</dc:rights><dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights></dc:dc>

</collection>