000165437 001__ 165437
000165437 005__ 20260108143204.0
000165437 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1163/18710328-12341305
000165437 0248_ $$2sideral$$a121974
000165437 037__ $$aART-2016-121974
000165437 041__ $$aeng
000165437 100__ $$0(orcid)0000-0002-4372-0855$$aArlettaz, Fernando$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000165437 245__ $$aState Neutrality and Legal Status of Religious Groups in the European Court of Human Rights Case-law
000165437 260__ $$c2016
000165437 5060_ $$aAccess copy available to the general public$$fUnrestricted
000165437 5203_ $$aFrom the premise of religious freedom, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) case-law has established a State duty of neutrality concerning religious matters. However, the concept of neutrality is not univocal, and the ECtHR uses various different forms of it. States have a duty to allow religious groups access to legal personality, but they are not obliged to grant every religious group the same kind of legal personality. A double or multi-level system of recognition is legitimate under the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) if some conditions are fulfilled. The ECtHR has also affirmed that the most radical kind of double or multi-level system, that of an established church, is not contrary to the Convention. In a recent case, however,the ECtHR seems to have adopted a stricter approach to the legitimacy of privileges granted to some church/churches above other ones.
000165437 540__ $$9info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess$$aAll rights reserved$$uhttp://www.europeana.eu/rights/rr-f/
000165437 592__ $$a0.117$$b2016
000165437 593__ $$aReligious Studies$$c2016$$dQ3
000165437 593__ $$aSociology and Political Science$$c2016$$dQ4
000165437 593__ $$aSocial Sciences (miscellaneous)$$c2016$$dQ4
000165437 593__ $$aPolitical Science and International Relations$$c2016$$dQ4
000165437 655_4 $$ainfo:eu-repo/semantics/article$$vinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
000165437 7102_ $$14010$$2381$$aUniversidad de Zaragoza$$bDpto. Dcho.Pe.,Filos.D.e Hª D.$$cÁrea Filosofía del Derecho
000165437 773__ $$g11, 3 (2016), 189-223$$tReligion and Human Rights$$x1871-0328
000165437 8564_ $$s397901$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/165437/files/texto_completo.pdf$$yPostprint
000165437 8564_ $$s2151497$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/165437/files/texto_completo.jpg?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yPostprint
000165437 909CO $$ooai:zaguan.unizar.es:165437$$particulos$$pdriver
000165437 951__ $$a2026-01-08-14:10:36
000165437 980__ $$aARTICLE