<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection>
<dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:invenio="http://invenio-software.org/elements/1.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><dc:identifier>doi:10.1093/ve/veab038</dc:identifier><dc:language>eng</dc:language><dc:creator>Dudas, Gytis</dc:creator><dc:creator>Huber, Greg</dc:creator><dc:creator>Wilkinson, Michael</dc:creator><dc:creator>Yllanes, David</dc:creator><dc:title>Polymorphism of genetic ambigrams</dc:title><dc:identifier>ART-2021-143301</dc:identifier><dc:description>Double synonyms in the genetic code can be used as a tool to test competing hypotheses regarding ambigrammatic narnavirus genomes. Applying the analysis to recent observations of Culex narnavirus 1 and Zhejiang mosquito virus 3 ambigrammatic viruses indicates that the open reading frame on the complementary strand of the segment coding for RNA-dependent RNA polymerase does not code for a functional protein. Culex narnavirus 1 has been shown to possess a second segment, also ambigrammatic, termed ‘Robin’. We find a comparable segment for Zhejiang mosquito virus 3, a moderately diverged relative of Culex narnavirus 1. Our analysis of Robin polymorphisms suggests that its reverse open reading frame also does not code for a functional protein. We make a hypothesis about its role.</dc:description><dc:date>2021</dc:date><dc:source>http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/165908</dc:source><dc:doi>10.1093/ve/veab038</dc:doi><dc:identifier>http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/165908</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>oai:zaguan.unizar.es:165908</dc:identifier><dc:identifier.citation>Virus evolution 7, 1 (2021), veab038 [11 pp.]</dc:identifier.citation><dc:rights>by</dc:rights><dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.es</dc:rights><dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights></dc:dc>

</collection>