000166029 001__ 166029
000166029 005__ 20260119170325.0
000166029 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1016/j.tjog.2017.08.008
000166029 0248_ $$2sideral$$a101945
000166029 037__ $$aART-2017-101945
000166029 041__ $$aeng
000166029 100__ $$aRuiz Campo, Leyre
000166029 245__ $$aPrenatal diagnosis of umbilical cord cyst: Clinical significance and prognosis
000166029 260__ $$c2017
000166029 5060_ $$aAccess copy available to the general public$$fUnrestricted
000166029 5203_ $$aObjective Clarify the prognosis of the prenatal ultrasound diagnosis of umbilical cord cysts at any gestation trimester and to assess the ultrasound findings and chromosomal alterations associated to this entity. Materials and methods Between 2003 and 2015 a multicenter study was carried out, collecting, in five centers in Spain, the associated findings and perinatal outcomes of 27 cases of umbilical cord cysts, regardless of gestational age of diagnosis. A bibliographic review was conducted to identify previous studies in order to compare them with our data. Results In our sample, the prognosis of this finding and the neonatal outcome, when isolated, is favorable, regardless of gestational age at diagnosis, multiple or unique presentation or vanishing or persistent cysts. Conclusions It is important to properly assess the umbilical cord cyst and when is diagnosed, it is recommended to conduct a meticulous ultrasound examination searching for other associated malformations. In our study the prognosis of this finding seems to be favorable when isolated. Also, there is no relation between prognosis and gestation weeks at diagnosis. On the other hand, when we find this entity with associated anomalies, it is recommended to assess the need to carry out a karyotype.
000166029 540__ $$9info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess$$aby-nc-nd$$uhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.es
000166029 590__ $$a1.029$$b2017
000166029 591__ $$aOBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY$$b72 / 80 = 0.9$$c2017$$dQ4$$eT3
000166029 592__ $$a0.412$$b2017
000166029 593__ $$aObstetrics and Gynecology$$c2017$$dQ3
000166029 655_4 $$ainfo:eu-repo/semantics/article$$vinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
000166029 700__ $$aSavirón Cornudella, Ricardo
000166029 700__ $$aGámez Alderete, Francisco
000166029 700__ $$aMartínez-Payo, Cristina
000166029 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0003-1595-8345$$aPérez Pérez, Pilar$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000166029 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0003-2102-0310$$aGarrido Fernández, Pilar$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000166029 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0003-0691-0251$$aLerma Puertas, Diego$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000166029 7102_ $$11004$$2645$$aUniversidad de Zaragoza$$bDpto. Cirugía,Ginecol.Obstetr.$$cÁrea Obstetricia y Ginecología
000166029 773__ $$g56, 5 (2017), 622-627$$pTaiwan. j. obstet. gynecol.$$tTAIWANESE JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY$$x1028-4559
000166029 8564_ $$s801356$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/166029/files/texto_completo.pdf$$yVersión publicada
000166029 8564_ $$s2530969$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/166029/files/texto_completo.jpg?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yVersión publicada
000166029 909CO $$ooai:zaguan.unizar.es:166029$$particulos$$pdriver
000166029 951__ $$a2026-01-19-14:38:27
000166029 980__ $$aARTICLE