000166036 001__ 166036
000166036 005__ 20260119170325.0
000166036 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1007/s00226-020-01254-6
000166036 0248_ $$2sideral$$a123359
000166036 037__ $$aART-2021-123359
000166036 041__ $$aeng
000166036 100__ $$0(orcid)0000-0002-9702-9314$$aMiralbes Buil, R.$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000166036 245__ $$aExperimental study of natural cork and cork agglomerates as a substitute for expanded polystyrene foams under compressive loads
000166036 260__ $$c2021
000166036 5060_ $$aAccess copy available to the general public$$fUnrestricted
000166036 5203_ $$aExpanded polystyrene (EPS) is a material that is widely used in energy absorbing applications, especially in helmets, despite its non-renewable origin. Cork and its derivatives, however, are proposed as a substitute for polystyrene foam (EPS) due to their renewable origin and their easy recyclability. In spite of the low-environmental footprint of cork and its derivatives, there is insufficient data on their mechanical behaviour. Consequently, under dynamic and quasi-static loads, four different-density EPS, a natural cork material and five different cork products with different grain sizes and heat treatments were tested. They were compared in terms of their stress–strain and specific stress–strain curve, their volumetric capability to absorb energy, their specific energy, average decelerations and peak deceleration. Finally, EPS foams cannot recover their initial shape upon deformation due to their low resilience capability. This is especially important in applications such as helmets, which are bound to be subjected to multiple impacts. However, cork and its products could have this capability for resilience and would therefore be more suitable for certain applications.
000166036 540__ $$9info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess$$aAll rights reserved$$uhttp://www.europeana.eu/rights/rr-f/
000166036 590__ $$a2.898$$b2021
000166036 591__ $$aMATERIALS SCIENCE, PAPER & WOOD$$b2 / 20 = 0.1$$c2021$$dQ1$$eT1
000166036 591__ $$aFORESTRY$$b20 / 69 = 0.29$$c2021$$dQ2$$eT1
000166036 592__ $$a0.553$$b2021
000166036 593__ $$aForestry$$c2021$$dQ1
000166036 593__ $$aPlant Science$$c2021$$dQ1
000166036 593__ $$aIndustrial and Manufacturing Engineering$$c2021$$dQ1
000166036 594__ $$a4.5$$b2021
000166036 655_4 $$ainfo:eu-repo/semantics/article$$vinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
000166036 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0001-8451-660X$$aRanz Angulo, D.$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000166036 700__ $$aIvens, J.
000166036 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0002-8411-1247$$aAbad Blasco, J.O.$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000166036 7102_ $$15004$$2545$$aUniversidad de Zaragoza$$bDpto. Ingeniería Mecánica$$cÁrea Ingeniería Mecánica
000166036 7102_ $$15002$$2305$$aUniversidad de Zaragoza$$bDpto. Ingeniería Diseño Fabri.$$cÁrea Expresión Gráfica en Ing.
000166036 773__ $$g55 (2021), 419–443$$pWood sci. technol.$$tWOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY$$x0043-7719
000166036 8564_ $$s10700324$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/166036/files/texto_completo.pdf$$yPostprint
000166036 8564_ $$s2080391$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/166036/files/texto_completo.jpg?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yPostprint
000166036 909CO $$ooai:zaguan.unizar.es:166036$$particulos$$pdriver
000166036 951__ $$a2026-01-19-14:38:38
000166036 980__ $$aARTICLE