000166106 001__ 166106 000166106 005__ 20260120151004.0 000166106 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1111/jir.12971 000166106 0248_ $$2sideral$$a130098 000166106 037__ $$aART-2022-130098 000166106 041__ $$aeng 000166106 100__ $$0(orcid)0000-0001-8467-8270$$aCorrea, A. B. 000166106 245__ $$aA meta-analytic review of attitudes towards the sexuality of adults with intellectual disabilities as measured by the ASQ-ID and related variables: Is context the key?; 35968736 000166106 260__ $$c2022 000166106 5060_ $$aAccess copy available to the general public$$fUnrestricted 000166106 5203_ $$aBackground: The attitudes of others towards the sexuality of people with intellectual disabilities are one of the main perceived barriers to them expressing their sexuality. Research on what influences these attitudes yields heterogeneous results. Method: A systematic review of the literature and a meta-analysis were carried out. Results: Eleven studies using the Attitudes to Sexuality Questionnaire—Individuals with an Intellectual Disability (ASQ-ID) were included. Within the included studies, the country''s socio-economic development and level of individualism were associated with attitudes towards the sexual rights, parenting and self-control of adults with intellectual disabilities. General population and staff samples held more favourable attitudes than family samples in terms of sexual rights and parenting. Age and gender did not yield significant results. Conclusions: Variables related to country context may underlie the differences observed between countries and therefore influence the population''s general thinking and ideologies. Unexpectedly, no age differences were observed. Gender-related results may reflect rapprochement between genders in sexuality. These findings are relevant for researchers and practitioners, as they suggest the importance of considering contextual factors when developing effective interventions that aim to support adults with disabilities to live their sexuality. © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research published by MENCAP and International Association of the Scientific Study of Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. 000166106 536__ $$9info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/DGA/S31-20D 000166106 540__ $$9info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess$$aby$$uhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.es 000166106 590__ $$a3.6$$b2022 000166106 591__ $$aREHABILITATION$$b2 / 73 = 0.027$$c2022$$dQ1$$eT1 000166106 591__ $$aEDUCATION, SPECIAL$$b1 / 43 = 0.023$$c2022$$dQ1$$eT1 000166106 592__ $$a0.935$$b2022 000166106 593__ $$aArts and Humanities (miscellaneous)$$c2022$$dQ1 000166106 593__ $$aRehabilitation$$c2022$$dQ1 000166106 593__ $$aPsychiatry and Mental Health$$c2022$$dQ2 000166106 593__ $$aNeurology$$c2022$$dQ2 000166106 593__ $$aNeurology (clinical)$$c2022$$dQ2 000166106 594__ $$a5.2$$b2022 000166106 655_4 $$ainfo:eu-repo/semantics/article$$vinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion 000166106 700__ $$aMoreno, J. D. 000166106 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0002-9813-9507$$aCastro, A.$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza 000166106 7102_ $$14009$$2740$$aUniversidad de Zaragoza$$bDpto. Psicología y Sociología$$cÁrea Psicología Social 000166106 773__ $$g66, 10 (2022), 727–742$$pJIDR, J. intellect. disabil. res.$$tJOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY RESEARCH$$x0964-2633 000166106 8564_ $$s3610542$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/166106/files/texto_completo.pdf$$yVersión publicada 000166106 8564_ $$s2030921$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/166106/files/texto_completo.jpg?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yVersión publicada 000166106 909CO $$ooai:zaguan.unizar.es:166106$$particulos$$pdriver 000166106 951__ $$a2026-01-20-14:17:45 000166106 980__ $$aARTICLE