@article{FausCliment:167703,
      author        = "Faus Climent, Arnau and Cardona Malfey, Rafael",
      title         = "{RESECCIÓN ARTROSCÓPICA DE POLO DISTAL  DE TRAPECIO Y
                       ESTABILIZACIÓN  TRAPECIOMETACARPIANA PERCUTÁNEA, UN NUEVO
                       ABORDAJE QUIRÚRGICO}",
      year          = "2024",
      note          = "ABSTRACT Introduction and objectives: 	Trapeziometacarpal
                       osteoarthritis is one of the pathologies that causes major
                       disability and pain in the upper limb, as the hand is our
                       primary tool for interacting with the world. This condition
                       is more common in postmenopausal women. Many aggressive
                       techniques are described for its treatment, which hinder
                       postoperative recovery. The central objective of the study
                       is to establish the effectiveness of a less invasive
                       technique that allows for early recovery, such as
                       arthroscopic resection of the distal pole of the trapezium
                       and percutaneous trapeziometacarpal stabilization. Material
                       and methods: 	This is an observational, retrospective,
                       non-interventional study with an analytical nature. The
                       sample includes patients who were in stage III of Eaton,
                       operated on at the Miguel Servet Hospital in Zaragoza
                       between March 25, 2021, and February 5, 2024. The following
                       data were collected, such as pain (EVA Scale) and hand
                       functionality (Quick Dash), before and after the
                       intervention using a questionnaire created on the Google
                       Forms platform. These data were subsequently analyzed using
                       the SPSS program, with statistical significance considered
                       at a p-value < 0.05. Results: 	Of the total sample, 85.5%
                       were postmenopausal women. The differences obtained after
                       the intervention regarding the scores on the EVA and Quick
                       Dash scales were statistically significant, confirming an
                       improvement in both pain and functionality. However, it was
                       not possible to determine from which point in the
                       postoperative period the functional improvement became
                       significant. Nor were any significant differences found
                       related to the age or sex of the patients. Conclusions: 	It
                       is claimed that the intervention is effective. The majority
                       of patients are postmenopausal women. A significant
                       correlation has been demonstrated between the improvement
                       in pain and the Quick Dash before and after the
                       intervention. Studies with a larger sample size are needed
                       to support and generalize our findings.",
}