<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection>
<dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:invenio="http://invenio-software.org/elements/1.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><dc:identifier>doi:10.1139/apnm-2015-0055</dc:identifier><dc:language>eng</dc:language><dc:creator>Legaz-Arrese, A.</dc:creator><dc:creator>López-Laval, I.</dc:creator><dc:creator>George, K.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Puente-Lanzarote, J.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Moliner-Urdiales, D.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Ayala-Tajuelo, V.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Mayolas-Pi, C.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Reverter-Masià, J.</dc:creator><dc:title>Individual variability in cardiac biomarker release after 30 min of high-intensity rowing in elite and amateur athletes</dc:title><dc:identifier>ART-2015-92023</dc:identifier><dc:description>This study had two objectives: (i) to examine individual variation in the pattern of cardiac troponin I (cTnI) and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) release in response to high-intensity rowing exercise, and (ii) to establish whether individual heterogeneity in biomarker appearance was influenced by athletic status (elite vs. amateur). We examined cTnI and NT-proBNP in 18 elite and 14 amateur rowers before and 5 min, 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 h after a 30-min maximal rowing test. Compared with pre-exercise levels, peak postexercise cTnI (pre: 0.014 ± 0.030 µg·L–1; peak post: 0.058 ± 0.091 µg·L–1; p = 0.000) and NT-proBNP (pre: 15 ± 11 ng·L–1; peak post: 31 ± 19 ng·L–1; p = 0.000) were elevated. Substantial individual heterogeneity in peak and time-course data was noted for cTnI. Peak cTnI exceeded the upper reference limit (URL) in 9 elite and 3 amateur rowers. No rower exceeded the URL for NT-proBNP. Elite rowers had higher baseline (0.019 ± 0.038 vs. 0.008 ± 0.015 µg·L–1; p = 0.003) and peak postexercise cTnI (0.080 ± 0.115 vs. 0.030 ± 0.029 µg·L–1; p = 0.022) than amateur rowers, but the change with exercise was similar between groups. There were no significant differences in baseline and peak postexercise NT-proBNP between groups. In summary, marked individuality in the cTnI response to a short but high-intensity rowing bout was observed. Athletic status did not seem to affect the change in cardiac biomarkers in response to high-intensity exercise.</dc:description><dc:date>2015</dc:date><dc:source>http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/168480</dc:source><dc:doi>10.1139/apnm-2015-0055</dc:doi><dc:identifier>http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/168480</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>oai:zaguan.unizar.es:168480</dc:identifier><dc:identifier.citation>Applied Physiology Nutrition and Metabolism 40, 9 (2015), 951-958</dc:identifier.citation><dc:rights>All rights reserved</dc:rights><dc:rights>http://www.europeana.eu/rights/rr-f/</dc:rights><dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights></dc:dc>

</collection>