<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection>
<dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:invenio="http://invenio-software.org/elements/1.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><dc:identifier>doi:10.1002/gj.2884</dc:identifier><dc:language>eng</dc:language><dc:creator>Calvín, P.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Santolaria, P.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Casas, A.M.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Pueyo, E.L.</dc:creator><dc:title>Detachment fold vs. ramp anticline: A gravity survey in the southern Pyrenean front (External Sierras)</dc:title><dc:identifier>ART-2017-99815</dc:identifier><dc:description>The Santo Domingo Anticline (External Sierras, Southern Pyrenees), which separates the Jaca piggyback basin from the Ebro foreland basin, is a key structure of the Pyrenees. Its geometry has been interpreted both as a detachment fold and as a hangingwall anticline associated with an underlying thrust. In this paper, we present the results from a gravity survey and 2.5D gravity modelling carried out around the Santo Domingo Anticline. Density measurements indicate a sharp density contrast between the Triassic evaporites-mudstones in the core of the anticline and the sedimentary sequence (limestones and sandstones) at its limbs. Gravity anomalies together with 2.5D gravity models allow to discern the along-strike structural changes. From east to west, we document a change from the ramp-associated fold to the detachment anticline. The capabilities and limitations of the gravimetric method for the determination of fold geometry are also discussed.</dc:description><dc:date>2017</dc:date><dc:source>http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/169109</dc:source><dc:doi>10.1002/gj.2884</dc:doi><dc:identifier>http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/169109</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>oai:zaguan.unizar.es:169109</dc:identifier><dc:relation>info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/MINECO/CGL2014-54118-C2</dc:relation><dc:identifier.citation>GEOLOGICAL JOURNAL 53, 1 (2017), 178-190</dc:identifier.citation><dc:rights>All rights reserved</dc:rights><dc:rights>http://www.europeana.eu/rights/rr-f/</dc:rights><dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights></dc:dc>

</collection>