<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection>
<dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:invenio="http://invenio-software.org/elements/1.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><dc:identifier>doi:10.1111/dth.15142</dc:identifier><dc:language>eng</dc:language><dc:creator>García-Gil, Miguel Fernando</dc:creator><dc:creator>Monte-Serrano, Juan</dc:creator><dc:creator>Lapeña-Casado, Alejandro</dc:creator><dc:creator>Villagrasa-Boli, Pablo</dc:creator><dc:creator>Ramírez-Lluch, Mar</dc:creator><dc:creator>Martínez-Pallás, Isabel</dc:creator><dc:creator>Bularca, Aura</dc:creator><dc:creator>Aldea-Manrique, Beatriz</dc:creator><dc:creator>Benito-Ruesca, Rafael</dc:creator><dc:creator>Ventura-Faci, María Purificación</dc:creator><dc:creator>Ara-Martín, Mariano</dc:creator><dc:title>No antibody response in cutaneous manifestations associated with COVID-19: An observational study of 64 cases with microbiological and clinical characterization</dc:title><dc:identifier>ART-2021-127169</dc:identifier><dc:description>Background: The microbiological diagnosis of skin lesions related to COVID-19 is not well known. Objective: Perform a microbiological diagnosis in COVID19-related cutaneous manifestations. Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed with 64 patients with cutaneous manifestations associated with COVID-19 who under- went serological and nasopharyngeal reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for SARS-CoV-2. Results: Out of the 64 patients, 6 patients had positive RT-PCR, with all of them developing SARS-CoV-2 IgG and 4 of them had positive IgM + IgA. Of the 58 patients with negative RT-PCR, 8 cases had positive IgM + IgA and only one of them had IgG seroconversion. Therefore, the infection was demon- strated in 7 cases (10.9%) and was doubtful in 7 other cases (10.9%) who presented negative RT-PCR and presence of IgA + IgM without subsequent seroconversion of IgG. Fifty patients (78.1%) had negative serological tests. The most frequent cutane- ous pattern was pseudo-chilblain (48.4%) followed by maculo-papular pattern (26.6%), urticarial lesions (10.9%), vesicular eruptions (6.3%) and livedoid pattern (4.7%). The maculo-papular pattern showed the highest positivity in RT-PCR (3 cases; 17.6%) and serologies (4 cases; 23.5%). Skin lesions developed after the systemic symptoms in most patients (19 cases; 61.3%). Conclusions: Microbiological confirma- tion tests may not be an effective diagnostic technique for COVID-related cutaneous manifestations or that attributed lesions are not related to COVID-19. Confounding fac- tors such as adverse drug reaction, serological cross-reactions with other viruses, the low production of antibodies in asymptomatic or mild forms of COVID-19 or its rapid disap- pearance, increase diagnostic uncertainty.</dc:description><dc:date>2021</dc:date><dc:source>http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/169177</dc:source><dc:doi>10.1111/dth.15142</dc:doi><dc:identifier>http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/169177</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>oai:zaguan.unizar.es:169177</dc:identifier><dc:identifier.citation>Dermatologic Therapy 34, 6 (2021), e15142 [5 pp.]</dc:identifier.citation><dc:rights>All rights reserved</dc:rights><dc:rights>http://www.europeana.eu/rights/rr-f/</dc:rights><dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess</dc:rights></dc:dc>

</collection>