000169939 001__ 169939
000169939 005__ 20260306154908.0
000169939 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1002/jclp.70114
000169939 0248_ $$2sideral$$a148463
000169939 037__ $$aART-2026-148463
000169939 041__ $$aeng
000169939 100__ $$aCastro-Calvo, J.
000169939 245__ $$aThe Semi‐Structured Clinical Interview for the Assessment of Compulsive Sexual Behavior (SSCI‐CSB): Development, Reliability, and Validity
000169939 260__ $$c2026
000169939 5060_ $$aAccess copy available to the general public$$fUnrestricted
000169939 5203_ $$aObjectives
The assessment of Compulsive Sexual Behavior (CSB) requires fine-grained assessment approaches, ideally through clinical interviews. However, none of the few available clinical interviews for CSB have demonstrated strong psychometric properties. To address this limitation, we developed the Semi-Structured Clinical Interview for the assessment of CSB (SSCI-CSB), an interview that gathers information on the manifestations, symptoms, and clinical course of CSB. The aim of this study was to examine its reliability and validity in a sample of patients seeking treatment for out-of-control sexual behavior.
Methods
The SSCI-CSB was administered as a routine assessment to a sample of 85 patients (81 men, four women) seeking outpatient treatment for CSB in two moments: at an initial screening (n = 85) and after 3 months (n = 22).
Results
Of the 16 CSB criteria assessed by the SSCI-CSB, four were endorsed by < 40% of the participants. Internal consistency was excellent (α = 0.95; ω = 0.97). Similarly, test-retest reliability was high (r of 0.882 and Kappa in the range of fair-to-almost-perfect agreement). The SSCI-CSB showed more specificity/positive predictive value than sensitivity/negative predictive value.
Conclusion
The SSCI-CSB may be an appropriate assessment tool to assess and diagnose CSB in the round in patients seeking treatment for out-of-control sexual behaviors.
000169939 536__ $$9info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/AEI/PID2021-127353OB-I00
000169939 540__ $$9info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess$$aby-nc-nd$$uhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.es
000169939 655_4 $$ainfo:eu-repo/semantics/article$$vinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
000169939 700__ $$aGiménez-García, C.
000169939 700__ $$aRuiz-Palomino, E.
000169939 700__ $$aGil-Juliá, B.
000169939 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0002-9316-6733$$aGarcía-Barba, M.$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000169939 700__ $$aBallester-Arnal, R.
000169939 7102_ $$14009$$2680$$aUniversidad de Zaragoza$$bDpto. Psicología y Sociología$$cÁrea Person.Eval.Trat.Psicoló.
000169939 773__ $$g(2026), [17 pp.]$$pJ. clin. psychol.$$tJOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY$$x0021-9762
000169939 8564_ $$s1294320$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/169939/files/texto_completo.pdf$$yVersión publicada
000169939 8564_ $$s2367855$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/169939/files/texto_completo.jpg?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yVersión publicada
000169939 909CO $$ooai:zaguan.unizar.es:169939$$particulos$$pdriver
000169939 951__ $$a2026-03-06-14:50:56
000169939 980__ $$aARTICLE