<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection>
<dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:invenio="http://invenio-software.org/elements/1.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><dc:identifier>doi:10.3390/nu18030466</dc:identifier><dc:language>eng</dc:language><dc:creator>Rojas-Valverde, Daniel</dc:creator><dc:creator>Scheer, Volker</dc:creator><dc:creator>Tuesta, Marcelo</dc:creator><dc:creator>Gómez-Carmona, Carlos D.</dc:creator><dc:title>Agreement and Reliability Between Urine Reagent Strips and Refractometry for Field Assessment of Hydration in Ultra-Trail Runners</dc:title><dc:identifier>ART-2026-148484</dc:identifier><dc:description>Background/Objectives: Accurate hydration assessment is critical for optimizing performance and preventing heat-related complications in ultra-endurance athletes. This study evaluated the agreement and reliability between urine reagent strips and refractometry for field-based hydration assessment via urine-specific gravity (USG) in ultra-trail runners. Methods: Thirty-four ultra-trail runners (22 males, 12 females; mean age 43.71 ± 11.50 years) participated during The Coastal Challenge, a 241-km multi-stage ultra-trail competition. Urine samples were collected before and after the first two stages (Stage 1: 41 km, 1071 m elevation; Stage 2: 40 km, 1828 m elevation). USG was measured using semi-quantitative urine reagent strips (Combur10Test M) and a handheld digital refractometer (Palm Abbe™). Agreement was assessed via paired t-tests, Pearson and Spearman correlations, intraclass correlation coefficients, and Bland-Altman plots across four measurement time points. Results: Strong agreement existed between methods with correlation coefficients of 0.92–0.99 (p &amp;lt; 0.01) within the hydration range typical of well-prepared ultra-endurance athletes (USG 1.010–1.020). No significant differences were found between devices at any time point (all p &amp;gt; 0.05). Bland-Altman analyses revealed minimal mean bias (range: −0.002 to +0.001 g/mL) and narrow limits of agreement, with fewer than 5% of values falling outside limits. Both methods detected significant increases in USG from pre- to post-stage (p &amp;lt; 0.01), indicating exercise-induced hypohydration. Conclusions: Semi-quantitative urine reagent strips and handheld refractometers demonstrate strong agreement for hydration assessment in ultra-trail runners under field conditions when not severely hypohydrated, supporting their interchangeable use for practical monitoring.</dc:description><dc:date>2026</dc:date><dc:source>http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/169944</dc:source><dc:doi>10.3390/nu18030466</dc:doi><dc:identifier>http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/169944</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>oai:zaguan.unizar.es:169944</dc:identifier><dc:relation>info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/DGA/S53-23R</dc:relation><dc:relation>info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/MCIU/FPU17-00407</dc:relation><dc:identifier.citation>Nutrients 18, 3 (2026), 466 [10 pp.]</dc:identifier.citation><dc:rights>by</dc:rights><dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.es</dc:rights><dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights></dc:dc>

</collection>