<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection>
<dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:invenio="http://invenio-software.org/elements/1.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><dc:identifier>doi:10.1111/1759-7714.70264</dc:identifier><dc:language>eng</dc:language><dc:creator>Fuentes-Martín, Álvaro</dc:creator><dc:creator>Martínez-Hernández, Néstor J.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Embun, Raul</dc:creator><dc:creator>Muñoz Moreno, María Fé</dc:creator><dc:creator>Cilleruelo Ramos, Ángel</dc:creator><dc:creator/><dc:title>Disruption of radiological surveillance following a global health crisis in resected lung cancer</dc:title><dc:identifier>ART-2026-148687</dc:identifier><dc:description>Objectives: Radiological surveillance after curative-intent lung cancer resection is essential for early detection of recurrence and second primary tumors. Large-scale health emergencies can compromise oncologic follow-up. This study quantifies the impact of a health crisis on radiological surveillance in a national cohort of resected lung cancer patients.
Methods: A time-segmented observational cohort study was performed using data from the prospective, multicenter GEVATS registry. Surveillance density (CT/month) was evaluated across three predefined periods: pre-pandemic (baseline), state of alarm (maximum healthcare restrictions), and post-alarm (recovery phase). The population at risk was updated for each period. Subgroup analyses during the post-alarm phase assessed prioritization according to neoadjuvant treatment, pathological stage, age, and comorbidity.
Results: Among 2382 eligible patients, surveillance density declined progressively from the pre-pandemic period (0.157 ± 0.079 CT/month) to the state of alarm (0.098 ± 0.071 CT/month). In the post-alarm phase, density dropped sharply to 0.023 ± 0.018 CT/month (equivalent to one CT every 3.6 years), representing a 76.5% reduction compared with the state-of-alarm period (p &lt; 0.001). This under-surveillance was generalized, with no significant differences by pathological stage (p = 0.084), age (p = 0.564), or comorbidity (p = 0.872). Only prior neoadjuvant therapy was associated with a slightly higher density (p = 0.040).
Conclusions: A prolonged health crisis resulted in a profound and persistent reduction in radiological surveillance after lung cancer resection, without evidence of risk-based prioritization. These findings support the need for contingency frameworks within clinical guidelines to preserve continuity of oncologic follow-up during future health emergencies.</dc:description><dc:date>2026</dc:date><dc:source>http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/170164</dc:source><dc:doi>10.1111/1759-7714.70264</dc:doi><dc:identifier>http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/170164</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>oai:zaguan.unizar.es:170164</dc:identifier><dc:identifier.citation>THORACIC CANCER 17, 5 (2026), e70264 [7 pp.]</dc:identifier.citation><dc:rights>by-nc-nd</dc:rights><dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.es</dc:rights><dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights></dc:dc>

</collection>