<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection>
<dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:invenio="http://invenio-software.org/elements/1.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><dc:identifier>doi:10.3390/healthcare14060774</dc:identifier><dc:language>eng</dc:language><dc:creator>Gómez-Torres, Piedad</dc:creator><dc:creator>Ruger-Navarrete, Azahara</dc:creator><dc:creator>Lasso-Olayo, Laura</dc:creator><dc:creator>Blázquez-Ornat, Isabel</dc:creator><dc:creator>Peña-Otero, David</dc:creator><dc:creator>Galarreta-Aperte, Sergio</dc:creator><dc:title>Shifts with nights and migraine prevalence among nurses: a systematic review and meta-analysis</dc:title><dc:identifier>ART-2026-148890</dc:identifier><dc:description>Background: Fixed night work and rotating schedules including nights may contribute to migraine via sleep disruption and circadian misalignment, but evidence is inconsistent and definitions vary. This systematic review and meta-analysis compared past-year migraine prevalence in nurses working night-inclusive schedules versus day-only or non-night schedules.

Methods: Following PRISMA 2020 and registered in PROSPERO (CRD420261304288), we searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library from inception to 3 February 2026 (English/Spanish). Observational studies in nurses (≥18 years) reporting past-year migraine prevalence by shift pattern were eligible. All included studies assessed past-year prevalence; pooled PRs reflect 1-year prevalence. Crude prevalence ratios (PRs) were calculated from contingency tables and pooled quantitatively. Risk of bias was assessed with the JBI prevalence checklist.

 Results: We identified 54 records; 4 studies were included (N = 3843) of which 3323 participants contributed to the comparative meta-analysis because complete disaggregated data were available to construct contingency tables. The pooled association between night-inclusive schedules and migraine prevalence was not statistically significant (PR = 0.95, 95% CI 0.82–1.10; I2 = 0%). Secondary intensity contrasts were inconclusive (high vs. low: PR = 1.24, 95% CI 0.46–3.36; high vs. zero nights: PR = 0.85, 95% CI 0.38–1.93). Conclusions: Current nurse-specific evidence does not show a statistically significant difference in migraine prevalence between night-inclusive and non-night schedules; however, the small evidence base and limited generalizability preclude firm conclusions. Future longitudinal studies are needed to clarify this association.</dc:description><dc:date>2026</dc:date><dc:source>http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/170387</dc:source><dc:doi>10.3390/healthcare14060774</dc:doi><dc:identifier>http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/170387</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>oai:zaguan.unizar.es:170387</dc:identifier><dc:identifier.citation>Healthcare (Switzerland) 14(6), 774 (2026), 15</dc:identifier.citation><dc:rights>by</dc:rights><dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.es</dc:rights><dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights></dc:dc>

</collection>