<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection>
<dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:invenio="http://invenio-software.org/elements/1.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><dc:identifier>doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2026.101597</dc:identifier><dc:language>eng</dc:language><dc:creator>García-Cazorla, Javier</dc:creator><dc:creator>Abós, Ángel</dc:creator><dc:creator>Matos, Lennia</dc:creator><dc:creator>Gargurevich, Rafael</dc:creator><dc:creator>García-González, Luis</dc:creator><dc:title>Evaluating longitudinal, reciprocal, and cross-sectional effects of (de)motivating teaching styles on students’ psychological and educational outcomes in physical education</dc:title><dc:identifier>ART-2026-149046</dc:identifier><dc:description>Grounded in Self-Determination Theory and the circumplex model of teaching behaviors, this three-wave study (N = 637 secondary students) analyzed longitudinal, reciprocal, and cross-sectional relations among (de)motivating teaching styles, basic psychological needs (BPN), and student outcomes using a structural equation model. Perceived autonomy-supportive and structuring styles at Time 1 (T1) predicted higher BPN satisfaction at Time 2 (T2), which, in turn, related to more positive experiences and perceived learning in class and greater intention for physical activity beyond class at Time 3 (T3). Conversely, controlling and chaotic styles at T1 were linked to BPN frustration at T2 and poorer outcomes at T3. BPN satisfaction (frustration) at T2 also showed a longitudinal associations with higher (lower) perceptions of autonomy-supportive/structuring, and lower (higher) controlling/chaotic styles at T3. Findings highlight long-term, bidirectional dynamics with implications for teacher education. The findings indicate that teacher training programs should foster autonomy-supportive and structuring styles while reducing controlling and chaotic ones to promote adaptive motivational patterns and improve student outcomes.</dc:description><dc:date>2026</dc:date><dc:source>http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/171002</dc:source><dc:doi>10.1016/j.stueduc.2026.101597</dc:doi><dc:identifier>http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/171002</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>oai:zaguan.unizar.es:171002</dc:identifier><dc:relation>info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/DGA/PROY_S01_24</dc:relation><dc:identifier.citation>Studies in Educational Evaluation 89 (2026), 101597 [11pp.]</dc:identifier.citation><dc:rights>by-nc-nd</dc:rights><dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.es</dc:rights><dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights></dc:dc>

</collection>