000171217 001__ 171217
000171217 005__ 20260515163945.0
000171217 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1136/bjophthalmol-2011-300916
000171217 0248_ $$2sideral$$a77252
000171217 037__ $$aART-2012-77252
000171217 041__ $$aeng
000171217 100__ $$0(orcid)0000-0003-4011-5622$$aElía,N.$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000171217 245__ $$aNormal reference ranges of optical coherence tomography parameters in childhood
000171217 260__ $$c2012
000171217 5203_ $$aObjective To report normal reference values for peripapillary retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL) thickness and optic disc parameters in children from a community population.
Methods The authors performed a cross-sectional study examining RNFL and optic nerve head (ONH) properties in 358 children aged between 6 and 13 years with no ocular disease. All children underwent an ophthalmic examination that included visual acuity (logMAR), stereopsis assessment (TNO) and optical coherence tomography (Cirrus OCT Zeiss, ‘Optic Disc Cube 200×200’ protocol). One eye from each subject selected at random was finally analysed. The authors evaluated the influence of height, gender and age on measurements.
Results High-quality scan data were obtained from 357 children and 344 were finally included. The mean age (SD) was 9.16 (1.7) years and the mean (SD) RNFL average thickness was 98.46 (10.79) μm. The temporal quadrant showed the thinnest RNFL (69.35±11.28 μm), followed by the nasal (71.30±13.45 μm), superior (123.65±19.49 μm) and inferior (130.18±18.13 μm) quadrants. The mean rim area (SD) and disc area (SD) were 1.59 (0.33) and 2.05 (0.39) mm2, respectively. The average cup to disc (C:D) ratio (SD) was 0.43 (0.19). The authors found no differences in any of the parameters with regard to weight, height and gender.
Conclusions This study demonstrates normative values of RNFL thickness and ONH parameters in a sample of Caucasian children from the general population.
000171217 540__ $$9info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess$$aAll rights reserved$$uhttp://www.europeana.eu/rights/rr-f/
000171217 590__ $$a2.725$$b2012
000171217 591__ $$aOPHTHALMOLOGY$$b9 / 59 = 0.153$$c2012$$dQ1$$eT1
000171217 655_4 $$ainfo:eu-repo/semantics/article$$vinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
000171217 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0002-1777-0349$$aPueyo,V.$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000171217 700__ $$aAltemir,I.
000171217 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0002-0670-5541$$aOros,D.$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000171217 700__ $$aPablo,L. E.
000171217 7102_ $$11004$$2645$$aUniversidad de Zaragoza$$bDpto. Cirugía,Ginecol.Obstetr.$$cÁrea Obstetricia y Ginecología
000171217 7102_ $$11004$$2646$$aUniversidad de Zaragoza$$bDpto. Cirugía,Ginecol.Obstetr.$$cÁrea Oftalmología
000171217 7102_ $$12002$$2647$$aUniversidad de Zaragoza$$bDpto. Física Aplicada$$cÁrea Óptica
000171217 773__ $$g96, 5 (2012), 665-670$$pBr. j. ophthalmol.$$tBritish Journal of Ophthalmology$$x0007-1161
000171217 8564_ $$s290042$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/171217/files/texto_completo.pdf$$yVersión publicada
000171217 8564_ $$s3067926$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/171217/files/texto_completo.jpg?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yVersión publicada
000171217 909CO $$ooai:zaguan.unizar.es:171217$$particulos$$pdriver
000171217 951__ $$a2026-05-15-14:55:17
000171217 980__ $$aARTICLE