<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
<record>
  <controlfield tag="001">171234</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20260515163946.0</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">10.1136/bjo.2010.193078</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="8" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="2">sideral</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">149300</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="037" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">ART-2011-149300</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">eng</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Garcia-Martin, E.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Comparison of imiquimod 5% cream versus radiotherapy as treatment for eyelid basal cell carcinoma</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">2011</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Background To compare the efficacy, cosmesis and tolerance of two non-surgical treatments—imiquimod (IMQ) 5% cream and radiotherapy (RT)—to combat periocular nodular basal cell carcinoma (BCC).

Methods Twenty-seven patients with clinical and histopathological diagnosis of nodular BCC on the eyelid were included and randomly selected: 15 patients were treated with IMQ 5% cream once daily, 5 days/week for 6 weeks, and 12 patients were treated with RT.

Results All tumours showed histopathological remission within 3 months of the treatment, and sustained clinical remission was documented in each patient after 24 months' follow-up. Treatment tolerability was rated as moderate with IMQ and good with RT. Functional results were better in patients treated with IMQ. Loss of eyelashes was reported for most of the patients treated with RT.

Conclusions IMQ and RT therapies are effective for treating eyelid nodular BCCs. Cosmesis and functional results were better with IMQ, while tolerability was higher with RT.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="9">info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">All rights reserved</subfield>
    <subfield code="u">http://www.europeana.eu/rights/rr-f/</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="590" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">2.902</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">2011</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="591" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">OPHTHALMOLOGY</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">10 / 58 = 0.172</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">2011</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">Q1</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">T1</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="655" ind1=" " ind2="4">
    <subfield code="a">info:eu-repo/semantics/article</subfield>
    <subfield code="v">info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Gil-Arribas, L. M.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Idoipe, M.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Alfaro, J.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Pueyo, V.</subfield>
    <subfield code="u">Universidad de Zaragoza</subfield>
    <subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0002-1777-0349</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Pablo, L. E.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Fernandez, F. J.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="710" ind1="2" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="1">1004</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">646</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Universidad de Zaragoza</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Dpto. Cirugía,Ginecol.Obstetr.</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">Área Oftalmología</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="g">95, 10 (2011), 1393-1396</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">Br. j. ophthalmol.</subfield>
    <subfield code="t">British Journal of Ophthalmology</subfield>
    <subfield code="x">0007-1161</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="s">355137</subfield>
    <subfield code="u">http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/171234/files/texto_completo.pdf</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">Versión publicada</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="s">3122406</subfield>
    <subfield code="u">http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/171234/files/texto_completo.jpg?subformat=icon</subfield>
    <subfield code="x">icon</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">Versión publicada</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="909" ind1="C" ind2="O">
    <subfield code="o">oai:zaguan.unizar.es:171234</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">articulos</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">driver</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">2026-05-15-14:55:39</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="980" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">ARTICLE</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
</collection>