000171306 001__ 171306 000171306 005__ 20260520092808.0 000171306 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2014.08.002 000171306 0248_ $$2sideral$$a149331 000171306 037__ $$aART-2014-149331 000171306 041__ $$aeng 000171306 100__ $$aGarcía-Ormaechea, Inés 000171306 245__ $$aValidation of the Preverbal Visual Assessment (PreViAs) questionnaire 000171306 260__ $$c2014 000171306 5203_ $$aBackground Visual cognitive integrative functions need to be evaluated by a behavioral assessment, which requires an experienced evaluator. The Preverbal Visual Assessment (PreViAs) questionnaire was designed to evaluate these functions, both in general pediatric population or in children with high risk of visual cognitive problems, through primary caregivers' answers. Aim We aimed to validate the PreViAs questionnaire by comparing caregiver reports with results from a comprehensive clinical protocol. Study design A total of 220 infants (< 2 years old) were divided into two groups according to visual development, as determined by the clinical protocol. Their primary caregivers completed the PreViAs questionnaire, which consists of 30 questions related to one or more visual domains: visual attention, visual communication, visual–motor coordination, and visual processing. Questionnaire answers were compared with results of behavioral assessments performed by three pediatric ophthalmologists. Results Results of the clinical protocol classified 128 infants as having normal visual maturation, and 92 as having abnormal visual maturation. The specificity of PreViAs questionnaire was > 80%, and sensitivity was 64%–79%. More than 80% of the infants were correctly classified, and test–retest reliability exceeded 0.9 for all domains. Conclusions The PreViAs questionnaire is useful to detect abnormal visual maturation in infants from birth to 24 months of age. It improves the anamnesis process in infants at risk of visual dysfunctions. 000171306 540__ $$9info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess$$aAll rights reserved$$uhttp://www.europeana.eu/rights/rr-f/ 000171306 590__ $$a1.785$$b2014 000171306 591__ $$aPEDIATRICS$$b46 / 120 = 0.383$$c2014$$dQ2$$eT2 000171306 591__ $$aOBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY$$b40 / 79 = 0.506$$c2014$$dQ3$$eT2 000171306 655_4 $$ainfo:eu-repo/semantics/article$$vinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion 000171306 700__ $$aGonzález, Inmaculada 000171306 700__ $$aDuplá, María 000171306 700__ $$aAndres, Eva 000171306 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0002-1777-0349$$aPueyo, Victoria$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza 000171306 7102_ $$11004$$2646$$aUniversidad de Zaragoza$$bDpto. Cirugía,Ginecol.Obstetr.$$cÁrea Oftalmología 000171306 773__ $$g90, 10 (2014), 635-638$$pEarly hum. dev.$$tEARLY HUMAN DEVELOPMENT$$x0378-3782 000171306 8564_ $$s288940$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/171306/files/texto_completo.pdf$$yVersión publicada 000171306 8564_ $$s2660467$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/171306/files/texto_completo.jpg?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yVersión publicada 000171306 909CO $$ooai:zaguan.unizar.es:171306$$particulos$$pdriver 000171306 951__ $$a2026-05-20-08:31:57 000171306 980__ $$aARTICLE