<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<articles>
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink/">
  <front>
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title/>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Calvo Pascual</surname>
            <given-names>Mónica</given-names>
          </name>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date pub-type="pub">
        <year>2014</year>
      </pub-date>
      <self-uri xlink:href="http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/31205"/>
      <self-uri xlink:href="http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/31205/files/TAZ-TFG-2014-2829.pdf"/>
    </article-meta>
    <abstract>The research project that I present below aims to show a comparative analysis of seven British newspapers in order to determine what was the position of the press regarding the Scottish Referendum held on 18 September 2014. For this purpose, first I will proffer a review of the history of Scotland, from its beginnings as an independent kingdom until its settlement as a nation of the United Kingdom, to try to understand what the causes of the referendum might be. Then, I will make an introduction about the current political situation of Scotland and in relation to the press. To continue, I will provide a general explanation on the power of suggestion of the media that will lead me to a comparative analysis of a personal selection of headlines and articles from seven British newspapers. Finally, my essay will offer a very brief comment on the impact and meaning of the referendum to eventually conclude with the idea that, although the vast majority of newspapers preferred the union, I found it difficult to determine to what extent they sought to manipulate or rather just to inform due to their use of a very detached and indirect tone in their publications.</abstract>
  </front>
  <article-type>TAZ</article-type>
</article>

</articles>