<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
    <record>
        <controlfield tag="001">3352</controlfield>
        <controlfield tag="005">20190219081243.0</controlfield>
        <datafield tag="037" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
            <subfield code="a">INPRO--2009-082</subfield>
        </datafield>
        <datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
            <subfield code="a">eng</subfield>
        </datafield>
        <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
            <subfield code="a">Hernández, Mónica</subfield>
        </datafield>
        <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
            <subfield code="a">Comparing algorithms for diffeomorphic registration: Stationary LDDMM and  Diffeomorphic Demons</subfield>
        </datafield>
        <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
            <subfield code="c">2009-09-15</subfield>
        </datafield>
        <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
            <subfield code="a">mult. p</subfield>
        </datafield>
        <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
            <subfield code="a">The stationary parameterization of diffeomorphisms is being increasingly used in computational anatomy. In certain applications it provides similar results to th e non-stationary parameterization alleviating the computational charge. With this characterization for diffeomorphisms, two different registration algor ithms have been recently proposed: stationary LDDMM and diffeomorphic Demons. To our knowledge, their theoretical and practical differences have not been anal yzed yet. In this article we provide a comparison between both algorithms in a common fram ework. To this end, we have studied the differences in the elements of both registratio n scenarios. We have analyzed the sensitivity of the regularization parameters in the smoothn ess of the final transformations and compared the performance of the registration re sults. Moreover, we have studied the potential of both algorithms for the computation o f essential operations for further statistical analysis. We have found that both methods have comparable performance in terms of image ma tching although the transformations are qualitatively different in some cases. Diffeomo rphic Demons shows a slight advantage in terms of computational time. However, it does not pr ovide as stationary LDDMM the vector field in the tangent space needed to compute statist ics or exact inverse transformations.</subfield>
        </datafield>
        <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
            <subfield code="9">info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</subfield>
            <subfield code="a">Esta obra está sujeta a una licencia de uso Creative Commons. Se permite la reproducción total o parcial, la distribución, la comunicación pública de la obra y la creación de obras derivadas, siempre que no sea con finalidades comerciales, y sempre que se reconzca la autoria de la obra original.</subfield>
            <subfield code="u">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/</subfield>
        </datafield>
        <datafield tag="653" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
            <subfield code="a">Computational Anatomy</subfield>
        </datafield>
        <datafield tag="653" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
            <subfield code="a">diffeomorphic registration</subfield>
        </datafield>
        <datafield tag="653" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
            <subfield code="a">stationary parameterization </subfield>
        </datafield>
        <datafield tag="653" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
            <subfield code="a">stationary LDDMM </subfield>
        </datafield>
        <datafield tag="653" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
            <subfield code="a">diffeomorphic Demons</subfield>
        </datafield>
        <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
            <subfield code="a">Pennec, Xavier</subfield>
        </datafield>
        <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
            <subfield code="a">Olmos Gassó, Salvador</subfield>
        </datafield>
        <datafield tag="856" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
            <subfield code="f">mhg@unizar.es</subfield>
        </datafield>
        <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2=" ">
            <subfield code="s">364241</subfield>
            <subfield code="u">http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/3352/files/INPRO--2009-082.pdf</subfield>
            <subfield code="z">Archivo asociado</subfield>
        </datafield>
        <datafield tag="910" ind1="2" ind2=" ">
            <subfield code="a"></subfield>
            <subfield code="b">Informática e Ingeniería de Sistemas</subfield>
        </datafield>
        <datafield tag="980" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
            <subfield code="a">PREPRINT</subfield>
        </datafield>
    </record>

    
</collection>