000056068 001__ 56068
000056068 005__ 20200221144338.0
000056068 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.7334/psicothema2015.197
000056068 0248_ $$2sideral$$a95023
000056068 037__ $$aART-2016-95023
000056068 041__ $$aeng
000056068 100__ $$aPorrúa-García, C.
000056068 245__ $$aDevelopment and validation of the scale of psychological abuse in intimate partner violence (EAPA-P)
000056068 260__ $$c2016
000056068 5060_ $$aAccess copy available to the general public$$fUnrestricted
000056068 5203_ $$aBackground: In the context of intimate partner violence, psychological abuse (PA) has progressively gained scientific relevance. Even so, a greater effort is needed to define and evaluate psychological intimate partner abuse. A new exhaustive and operative taxonomy of PA strategies leads to the contribution of a new evaluation instrument. Method: Participants were 101 women between 24 and 82 years old, who were abused by their partners and attended to in different municipal Catalan services, specialized in the topic. Results: The analyses have shown the suitability of a 19-item instrument divided into two factors: (1) direct PA strategies and (2) indirect PA strategies. The former includes strategies that affect the emotional, cognitive and behavioral dimension of the victim. The latter includes items that measure the amount of control and domination over the victim’s context. This scale has adequate psychometric properties in terms of score reliability and the validity of the relationship with other women’s health variables. Conclusions: The EAPA-P, created based on a new definition and taxonomy of the forms of PA, is presented as a valid instrument to detect and measure intimate partner PA.
000056068 536__ $$9info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/MEC/PSI2010-16098
000056068 540__ $$9info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess$$aby$$uhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/
000056068 590__ $$a1.344$$b2016
000056068 591__ $$aPSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY$$b61 / 128 = 0.477$$c2016$$dQ2$$eT2
000056068 592__ $$a0.676$$b2016
000056068 593__ $$aPsychology (miscellaneous)$$c2016$$dQ2
000056068 655_4 $$ainfo:eu-repo/semantics/article$$vinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
000056068 700__ $$aRodríguez-Carballeira, Á.
000056068 700__ $$aEscartín, J.
000056068 700__ $$aGómez-Benito, J.
000056068 700__ $$aAlmendros, C.
000056068 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0002-3393-2061$$aMartín-Peña, J.$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000056068 7102_ $$14009$$2740$$aUniversidad de Zaragoza$$bDpto. Psicología y Sociología$$cÁrea Psicología Social
000056068 773__ $$g28, 2 (2016), 214-221$$pPsicothema$$tPsicothema$$x0214-9915
000056068 8564_ $$s361086$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/56068/files/texto_completo.pdf$$yVersión publicada
000056068 8564_ $$s108859$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/56068/files/texto_completo.jpg?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yVersión publicada
000056068 909CO $$ooai:zaguan.unizar.es:56068$$particulos$$pdriver
000056068 951__ $$a2020-02-21-13:48:41
000056068 980__ $$aARTICLE