Use of a new ocular insert versus conventional mydriasis in cataract surgery
Resumen: Background. To compare the efficacy and safety of a new ocular insert versus conventional mydriasis in cataract surgery. Methods. We selected 70 patients undergoing cataract surgery. Thirty five patients (Group 1) received instillation of mydriatic drops (tropicamide 1%, phenylephrine 10%, and cyclopentolate 1%) prior to surgery, and 35 patients (Group 2) had a Mydriasert insert (Théa Pharma) (0.28¿mg of tropicamide and 5.4¿mg of phenylephrine hydrochloride) placed in the inferior fornix. Pupil size before and after surgery, blood pressure, and heart rate were measured. Results. Before surgery, pupil diameter was ¿mm in Group 1 and in Group 2 ( ). Twenty four hours after surgery, pupil diameter was ¿mm in Group 1 and in Group 2 ( ). There were no statistically significant differences in blood pressure or heart rate between groups. Conclusions. The effect of the Mydriasert insert was similar to conventional mydriatic agents. Pupil size was restored to normal faster when using the Mydriasert insert compared with conventional mydriatic agents for pupil dilation.
Idioma: Inglés
DOI: 10.1155/2013/849349
Año: 2013
Publicado en: BioMed Research International 2013 (2013), 849349 [4 pp]
ISSN: 2314-6133

Factor impacto JCR: 0.0 (2013)
Categ. JCR: MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Categ. JCR: BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY

Tipo y forma: Article (Published version)
Área (Departamento): Área Oftalmología (Dpto. Cirugía,Ginecol.Obstetr.)
Exportado de SIDERAL (2018-09-11-13:27:53)


Visitas y descargas

Este artículo se encuentra en las siguientes colecciones:
articulos



 Notice créée le 2016-12-16, modifiée le 2018-09-11


Versión publicada:
 PDF
Évaluer ce document:

Rate this document:
1
2
3
 
(Pas encore évalué)