<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection>
<dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:invenio="http://invenio-software.org/elements/1.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><dc:identifier>doi:10.1056/NEJMc1308259</dc:identifier><dc:language>eng</dc:language><dc:creator>Grzybowski, A.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Ascaso, F.J.</dc:creator><dc:title>Antithrombotic therapy and invasive procedures [5]</dc:title><dc:identifier>ART-2013-83195</dc:identifier><dc:description>To the Editor: 
Baron et al. (May 30 issue) make important  suggestions  in  their  review  article; however,  we  propose  that  quantitative  assessment  of  iatrogenic  bleeding  hazards  must  be considered as well as thrombosis prevention. Although CHA2DS2–VASc scoring for atrial fibrillation is mentioned, the Hypertension, Abnormal Renal/Liver Function, Stroke, Bleeding History or Predisposition, Labile INR, Elderly, Drugs/Alcohol Concomitantly (HAS-BLED) score for bleeding has also been validated. Both scores calculate  estimated  annual  risks  and  benefits  and hence can guide future therapy...</dc:description><dc:date>2013</dc:date><dc:source>http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/61475</dc:source><dc:doi>10.1056/NEJMc1308259</dc:doi><dc:identifier>http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/61475</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>oai:zaguan.unizar.es:61475</dc:identifier><dc:identifier.citation>NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE 369, 11 (2013), 1077-1080</dc:identifier.citation><dc:rights>All rights reserved</dc:rights><dc:rights>http://www.europeana.eu/rights/rr-f/</dc:rights><dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights></dc:dc>

</collection>