000062030 001__ 62030
000062030 005__ 20190709135445.0
000062030 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.5424/sjar/2017151-9950
000062030 0248_ $$2sideral$$a99170
000062030 037__ $$aART-2017-99170
000062030 041__ $$aeng
000062030 100__ $$aMestre, L.
000062030 245__ $$aInfluence of plum rootstocks on agronomic performance, leaf mineral nutrition and fruit quality of ‘catherina’ peach cultivar in heavy-calcareous soil conditions
000062030 260__ $$c2017
000062030 5060_ $$aAccess copy available to the general public$$fUnrestricted
000062030 5203_ $$aThe agronomic performance and leaf mineral nutrition of the non-melting clingstone peach cv. ‘Catherina’ was evaluated on seven hexaploid plum rootstocks, as well as one Prunus persica seedling. They were assessed over a period of 15 years in a field trial at the Experimental Station of Aula Dei-CSIC (Zaragoza, Spain), located in the Ebro Valley (NE Spain). Growing conditions generated varying levels of tree mortality, the highest with Constantí 1, Monpol and Montizo, whereas all Adesoto, GF 655/2 and PM 105 AD trees survived well. GF 655/2 and P. Soto 67 AD proved to be the most dwarfing rootstocks, while Constantí 1 and Monpol were the most invigorating and generated greater cumulative yields. However, the highest yield efficiency was recorded on GF 655/2 and Montizo, although they did not differ significantly from Adesoto and P. Soto 67 AD. The highest average values for fruit weight were observed on PM 105 AD and the lowest on GF 655/2, but they did not differ significantly from the rest of the rootstocks. The highest average values for the soluble solids content were observed on the Pollizo rootstocks Adesoto and PM 105 AD, followed by P. Soto 67 AD. All rootstocks induced nitrogen deficiency, with the exception of Constantí 1, GF 655/2 and Montizo, and iron deficiency, except PM 105 AD. The invigorating rootstock Constantí 1 seemed to induce higher SPAD values. According to the SDOP index, Montizo presented the most suitable balanced nutritional index, but it did not differ significantly from the rest of the rootstocks except GF 655/2 and P. Soto 67 AD.
000062030 536__ $$9info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/DGA/A44$$9info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/MEC/AGL2005-05533$$9info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/MICINN/AGL2011-24576$$9info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/MINECO/AGL2008-00283
000062030 540__ $$9info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess$$aby$$uhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/
000062030 590__ $$a0.811$$b2017
000062030 591__ $$aAGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY$$b29 / 56 = 0.518$$c2017$$dQ3$$eT2
000062030 592__ $$a0.37$$b2017
000062030 593__ $$aAgronomy and Crop Science$$c2017$$dQ2
000062030 655_4 $$ainfo:eu-repo/semantics/article$$vinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
000062030 700__ $$aReig, G.
000062030 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0002-4161-4565$$aBetrán, J.A.$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000062030 700__ $$aMoreno, M.A.
000062030 7102_ $$15011$$2240$$aUniversidad de Zaragoza$$bDpto. CC.Agrar.y Medio Natural$$cÁrea Edafología y Quím.Agríco.
000062030 773__ $$g15, 1 (2017), e0901 [11 pp]$$pSpan. j. agric. res.$$tSpanish Journal of Agricultural Research$$x1695-971X
000062030 8564_ $$s369334$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/62030/files/texto_completo.pdf$$yVersión publicada
000062030 8564_ $$s107935$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/62030/files/texto_completo.jpg?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yVersión publicada
000062030 909CO $$ooai:zaguan.unizar.es:62030$$particulos$$pdriver
000062030 951__ $$a2019-07-09-11:38:11
000062030 980__ $$aARTICLE