<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection>
<dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:invenio="http://invenio-software.org/elements/1.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><dc:identifier>doi:10.1039/c6dt03010f</dc:identifier><dc:language>eng</dc:language><dc:creator>Iturmendi, Amaia</dc:creator><dc:creator>Sanz Miguel, Pablo J.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Popoola, Saheed A.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Al-Saadi, Abdulaziz A.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Iglesias, Manuel</dc:creator><dc:creator>Oro, Luis A.</dc:creator><dc:title>Dimethylphosphinate bridged binuclear Rh(i) catalysts for the alkoxycarbonylation of aromatic C-H bonds</dc:title><dc:identifier>ART-2016-102703</dc:identifier><dc:description>A variety of binuclear rhodium(I) complexes featuring two bridging dimethylphosphinate ligands ((CH3)2PO2-) have been prepared and tested in the alkoxycarbonylation of aromatic C–H bonds. The complex [Rh(µ-¿O,O'-(CH3)2PO2)(cod)]2 has been prepared by a reaction of [Rh(µ-MeO)(cod)]2 with 2 equivalents of dimethylphosphinic acid. Binuclear complexes [Rh(µ-¿O,O'-(CH3)2PO2)(CO)L]2 (L = PPh3, P(OMe)Ph2 and P(OPh)3) were obtained by carbonylation of the related mononuclear complexes [Rh(¿O-(CH3)2PO2)(cod)(L)], which were prepared in situ by the reaction of [Rh(µ-¿O,O'-(CH3)2PO2)(cod)]2 with 2 equivalents of L. Conversely, if L = IPr, the reaction of [Rh(µ-¿O,O'-(CH3)2PO2)(CO)L]2 with carbon monoxide affords the mononuclear complex [Rh(¿O-(CH3)2PO2)(CO)2IPr]. The subsequent reaction with trimethylamine N-oxide gives the corresponding binuclear complex [Rh(µ-¿O,O'-(CH3)2PO2)(CO)(IPr)]2 by abstraction of one of the carbonyl ligands. Complexes [Rh(µ-¿O,O'-(CH3)2PO2)(cod)]2 and [Rh(¿O-(CH3)2PO2)(cod)(L)] (L = IPr, PPh3, P(OMe)Ph2, P(OPh)3) are active precatalysts in the alkoxycarbonylation of C–H bonds, with the ligand system playing a key role in the catalytic activity. The complexes that feature more labile Rh–L bonds give rise to better catalysts, probably due to the more straightforward substitution of L by a second carbonyl ligand, since a more electrophilic carbonyl carbon atom is more susceptible toward aryl migration. In fact, complexes [Rh(µ-¿O,O'-(CH3)2PO2)(CO)2]2 and [Rh(µ-Cl)(CO)2]2, generated in situ from [Rh(µ-¿O,O'-(CH3)2PO2)(cod)]2 and [Rh(µ-Cl)(cod)2]2, respectively, are the most active catalysts tested in this work.</dc:description><dc:date>2016</dc:date><dc:source>http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/64316</dc:source><dc:doi>10.1039/c6dt03010f</dc:doi><dc:identifier>http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/64316</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>oai:zaguan.unizar.es:64316</dc:identifier><dc:relation>info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/DGA/E07</dc:relation><dc:relation>info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/MINECO/Consolider-Ingenio/CSD2009-0050</dc:relation><dc:identifier.citation>Dalton Transactions 45, 42 (2016), 16955-16965</dc:identifier.citation><dc:rights>All rights reserved</dc:rights><dc:rights>http://www.europeana.eu/rights/rr-f/</dc:rights><dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights></dc:dc>

</collection>