<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection>
<dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:invenio="http://invenio-software.org/elements/1.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><dc:identifier>doi:10.3928/1081597X-20170601-01</dc:identifier><dc:language>eng</dc:language><dc:creator>Ariza-Gracia, Miguel A.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Ortillés, Ángel</dc:creator><dc:creator>Pascual, Gemma</dc:creator><dc:creator>Calvo, Begoña</dc:creator><dc:creator>Rodríguez-Matas, José F.</dc:creator><dc:title>Reply: why indentation cannot be considered exactly equivalent to non-contact tonometry</dc:title><dc:identifier>ART-2017-100934</dc:identifier><dc:description>We would like to thank Drs. Sinha Roy and Shetty for their comments regarding our article.1 It is comforting to see that our research is appreciated by our colleagues. Nevertheless, we do not fully agree with their observations and provide detailed responses in consequence.</dc:description><dc:date>2017</dc:date><dc:source>http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/64383</dc:source><dc:doi>10.3928/1081597X-20170601-01</dc:doi><dc:identifier>http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/64383</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>oai:zaguan.unizar.es:64383</dc:identifier><dc:identifier.citation>JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE SURGERY 33, 7 (2017), 496-500</dc:identifier.citation><dc:rights>by</dc:rights><dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/</dc:rights><dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights></dc:dc>

</collection>