000069666 001__ 69666
000069666 005__ 20200103141020.0
000069666 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1590/1678-4499.2016367
000069666 0248_ $$2sideral$$a104649
000069666 037__ $$aART-2018-104649
000069666 041__ $$aeng
000069666 100__ $$aPereira, I.S.
000069666 245__ $$aGenotypic differences in cyanogenic glycosides levels of compatible Prunus persica P. Persica and incompatible P. persica P. mume combinations
000069666 260__ $$c2018
000069666 5060_ $$aAccess copy available to the general public$$fUnrestricted
000069666 5203_ $$aGraft incompatibility is a phenomenon associated with complex physiological, biochemical, and genetic interactions between scion and rootstock. The main objective of this work was to assess the role of cyanogenic glycosides (CGs), amygdalin and prunasin, in the graft incompatibility of Prunus and possible biochemical effects in compounds of the phenylpropanoid pathway. Graft compatibility, amygdalin and prunasin content, phenylalanine ammonia-lyase activity, total phenolic compounds content and antioxidant activity, were studied in different graft combinations (Chimarrita/Capdeboscq; Chimarrita/Tsukuba 1; Chimarrita/Umezeiro; Maciel/Capdeboscq; Maciel/’Tsukuba 1; Maciel/Umezeiro) and ungrafted genotypes. The results indicate that there was graft incompatibility of Chimarrita and Maciel cultivars grafted into Umezeiro rootstock. Combinations identified as incompatible showed higher prunasin concentration and phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL) activity in rootstock and greater concentration of total phenolics compounds and antioxidant activity in scion and rootstock. The results indicate that large differences in CGs concentration, especially prunasin, can be the graft incompatibility cause between Prunus persica and P. mume. The prunasin concentration may be considered a promising marker to predict graft compatibility between P. persica and P. mume.
000069666 540__ $$9info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess$$aby$$uhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/
000069666 590__ $$a1.058$$b2018
000069666 591__ $$aAGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY$$b26 / 56 = 0.464$$c2018$$dQ2$$eT2
000069666 592__ $$a0.657$$b2018
000069666 593__ $$aMaterials Science (miscellaneous)$$c2018$$dQ1
000069666 593__ $$aAgricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous)$$c2018$$dQ1
000069666 655_4 $$ainfo:eu-repo/semantics/article$$vinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
000069666 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0001-5751-0456$$aPina, A.
000069666 700__ $$aAntunes, L.E.C.
000069666 700__ $$aCampos, Â.D.
000069666 700__ $$aFachinello, J.C.
000069666 773__ $$g77, 1 (2018), 1-12$$pBragantia$$tBRAGANTIA$$x0006-8705
000069666 8564_ $$s603456$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/69666/files/texto_completo.pdf$$yVersión publicada
000069666 8564_ $$s61187$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/69666/files/texto_completo.jpg?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yVersión publicada
000069666 909CO $$ooai:zaguan.unizar.es:69666$$particulos$$pdriver
000069666 951__ $$a2020-01-03-14:01:02
000069666 980__ $$aARTICLE