<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection>
<dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:invenio="http://invenio-software.org/elements/1.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><dc:language>eng</dc:language><dc:creator>Montero-Marin, J.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Tops, M.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Prado-Abril, J.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Puebla-Guedea, M.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Yus, M.C.P.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Montoyo, A.L.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Garcia Campayo, J.</dc:creator><dc:title>Symptoms of distress when suffering from burnout: a comparison between the traditional and typological definitions of the syndrome</dc:title><dc:identifier>ART-2016-105075</dc:identifier><dc:description>Objective: To compare the structure and explanatory power of the traditional and the subtype burnout definitions on symptoms of distress.
Methods: We used a cross-sectional design with a random sample of university employees (n=429), who completed the MBI-GS, BCSQ-12 and HSCL-30. The structure of the scales was assessed using parallel analysis from polychoric correlations, unweighted least squares and pro- min rotation. Multivariate regression models were built among symptoms and burnout models.
Results: The HSCL showed a two-factor structure (psychological and somatic; IFS=0.87; GFI=0.99; RMSR=0.05); the MBI a forced three-factor structure (exhaustion, efficacy and cyni- cism; IFS=0.95; GFI&gt;0.99; RMSR=0.03); the BCSQ a three-factor structure (neglect, lack of development and overload; IFS=0.98; GFI&gt;0.99; RMSR=0.02). The variance of psychological distress was for 40% explained by MBI-GS and for 27% by BCSQ-12; the variance of somatic symptoms was for 31% explained by MBI-GS and 16% by BCSQ-12. All the BCSQ-12 factors contributed to explain psychological and somatic symptoms, but only exhaustion from MBI-GS.
Conclusions: The typological definition showed better structure, but worse explanatory power on symptoms, than the traditional perspective. Exhaustion seems to be the burnout core dimension, althought the subtypes would explain a specific characterization of the syndrome.</dc:description><dc:date>2016</dc:date><dc:source>http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/69938</dc:source><dc:identifier>http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/69938</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>oai:zaguan.unizar.es:69938</dc:identifier><dc:identifier.citation>Cuadernos de medicina psicosomática y psiquiatría de enlace 120 (2016), 9-20</dc:identifier.citation><dc:rights>All rights reserved</dc:rights><dc:rights>http://www.europeana.eu/rights/rr-f/</dc:rights><dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights></dc:dc>

</collection>