<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection>
<dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:invenio="http://invenio-software.org/elements/1.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><dc:identifier>doi:10.1016/j.meatsci.2016.09.009</dc:identifier><dc:language>eng</dc:language><dc:creator>Passetti, R. A. C.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Torrecilhas, J. A.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Ornaghi, M. G.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Mottin, C.</dc:creator><dc:creator>de Oliveira, C. A. L.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Guerrero, A.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Campo, María del Mar</dc:creator><dc:creator>Sañudo, C.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Prado, I. N. do</dc:creator><dc:title>Validation of photographs usage to evaluate meat visual acceptability of young bulls finished in feedlot fed with or without essential oils</dc:title><dc:identifier>ART-2017-96658</dc:identifier><dc:description>Forty ½ Brown Swiss × ½ Nellore crossbred bulls were distributed into three experimental groups: CON – diet without addition of essential oils; CLO – diet with average 5, 000 mg/animal/day of clove essential oils and CIN – diet with average 5, 000 mg/animal/day of cinnamon essential oils to evaluate three methodologies of visual acceptability: with steaks directly in Trays and Sequential and Random photos. Seventeen consumers evaluated visual appearance of meat using a 9-point structured hedonic scale. CON group presented higher shelf-life than essential oils groups. Trays and Sequential scores were similar in the majority of days; thus digital images could be used to evaluate colour evolution. However, Random photos resulted in lower scores and slower acceptability decrease than Trays and Sequential photos (p &lt; 0.05) among the second and fifth day of display. Random photos presented a lower and more constant standard deviation than Trays and Sequential photos (p &lt; 0.01) indicating that this methodology promoted a higher standard situation for meat colour evaluation.</dc:description><dc:date>2017</dc:date><dc:source>http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/70584</dc:source><dc:doi>10.1016/j.meatsci.2016.09.009</dc:doi><dc:identifier>http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/70584</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>oai:zaguan.unizar.es:70584</dc:identifier><dc:identifier.citation>Meat Science 123 (2017), 105-111</dc:identifier.citation><dc:rights>by-nc-nd</dc:rights><dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/</dc:rights><dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights></dc:dc>

</collection>