000070672 001__ 70672
000070672 005__ 20200221144338.0
000070672 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1155/2016/7074016
000070672 0248_ $$2sideral$$a106041
000070672 037__ $$aART-2016-106041
000070672 041__ $$aeng
000070672 100__ $$0(orcid)0000-0001-5320-7839$$aBambo, M.P.
000070672 245__ $$aEvaluation of Contrast Sensitivity, Chromatic Vision, and Reading Ability in Patients with Primary Open Angle Glaucoma
000070672 260__ $$c2016
000070672 5060_ $$aAccess copy available to the general public$$fUnrestricted
000070672 5203_ $$aPurpose. To compare contrast sensitivity, acquired color vision deficiency, and reading ability in patients with glaucoma at different stages of the disease and to establish correlations between visual field parameters and visual function scores.
Methods. This prospective cross-sectional study included 121 glaucoma patients. Subjects with a diagnosis of chronic open angle glaucoma were recruited and classified according to Hodapp-Parrish-Anderson criteria. Patients with severe visual field defects were excluded because they were older, which could bias the interpretation of visual function tests. Contrast sensitivity was measured using the Pelli-Robson Chart and the CSV1000E test. Chromatic vision was evaluated using the Farnsworth-panel D15 and the L''Anthony D15 tests of Vision Color Recorder software. Reading ability was measured using Radner-Vissum test.
Results. Contrast sensitivity (with photopic and mesopic luminance with glare) differed significantly between patients with early and moderate visual field defects (p < 0.05). Reading ability scores and results of the chromatic vision tests did not differ significantly between the two groups. Significant and moderate Spearman correlations between visual field indexes and contrast sensitivity tests were detected.
Conclusions. Contrast sensitivity was significantly worse in patients with moderate glaucoma compared to those with early-stage glaucoma. Evaluation of visual function in clinical practice provides important information to address a glaucoma patient''s vision complaints.
000070672 540__ $$9info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess$$aby$$uhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/
000070672 590__ $$a1.712$$b2016
000070672 591__ $$aOPHTHALMOLOGY$$b35 / 59 = 0.593$$c2016$$dQ3$$eT2
000070672 591__ $$aMEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL$$b84 / 128 = 0.656$$c2016$$dQ3$$eT2
000070672 592__ $$a0.812$$b2016
000070672 593__ $$aOphthalmology$$c2016$$dQ2
000070672 655_4 $$ainfo:eu-repo/semantics/article$$vinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
000070672 700__ $$aFerrandez, B.
000070672 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0001-8563-3437$$aGuerri, N.$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000070672 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0002-4316-1635$$aFuertes, I.$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000070672 700__ $$aCameo, B.
000070672 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0002-1402-3129$$aPolo, V.$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000070672 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0002-6745-7668$$aLarrosa, J.M.$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000070672 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0001-6258-2489$$aGarcia-Martin, E.$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000070672 7102_ $$11004$$2646$$aUniversidad de Zaragoza$$bDpto. Cirugía,Ginecol.Obstetr.$$cÁrea Oftalmología
000070672 773__ $$g2016, 7074016 (2016), [6 pp]$$pJ. Ophthalmol.$$tJournal of Ophthalmology$$x2090-004X
000070672 8564_ $$s1266217$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/70672/files/texto_completo.pdf$$yVersión publicada
000070672 8564_ $$s101166$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/70672/files/texto_completo.jpg?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yVersión publicada
000070672 909CO $$ooai:zaguan.unizar.es:70672$$particulos$$pdriver
000070672 951__ $$a2020-02-21-13:48:39
000070672 980__ $$aARTICLE