000070716 001__ 70716
000070716 005__ 20201105083207.0
000070716 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.5424/sjar/2016143-9122
000070716 0248_ $$2sideral$$a105950
000070716 037__ $$aART-2016-105950
000070716 041__ $$aeng
000070716 100__ $$0(orcid)0000-0001-8042-8688$$aRipoll, G.
000070716 245__ $$aBody size, carcass and meat quality of three commercial beef categories of 'Serrana de Teruel' breed
000070716 260__ $$c2016
000070716 5060_ $$aAccess copy available to the general public$$fUnrestricted
000070716 5203_ $$aThe aim of this study was to analyse three commercial beef categories of the ''Serrana de Teruel breed'' to define the appropriate commercial option. Twenty "Serrana de Teruel" male calves at 9 months were assigned to the commercial beef categories ( young bulls, bulls and steers), slaughtered at 12, 22 and 22 months of age, respectively. The in vivo ultrasound backfat thickness was greater than the dorsal fat thickness, and the young bulls and steers had a similar fat thickness, that was greater than the bulls in both areas. The slaughter weight and cold carcass weight were significantly different between the commercial categories. However, the differences were not sufficient to modify the dressing percentage, carcass conformation and fatness degree between the young bulls and bulls. The maximum stress of the muscle at 7 d of ageing was lower in the steers than in the young bulls and bulls. In general, the lightness of the meat in the bulls was lower than that in the young bulls and steers. The subcutaneous fat of the bull carcasses had a vivid colour and stored more carotenoids than that of the young bulls and steers. Hence, bulls produced heavier and better conformed carcasses with more edible meat and less fat than the other categories. However, steers are recommended to produce large carcasses with more trim and cover fat than the other categories. Finally, it seems that bulls are the most suitable commercial category to "Serrana de Teruel" breed.
000070716 536__ $$9info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/DGA/FITE-2013-351A$$9info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/INIA/PET2007-05-C03-01
000070716 540__ $$9info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess$$aby-nc$$uhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/es/
000070716 590__ $$a0.687$$b2016
000070716 591__ $$aAGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY$$b32 / 56 = 0.571$$c2016$$dQ3$$eT2
000070716 592__ $$a0.36$$b2016
000070716 593__ $$aAgronomy and Crop Science$$c2016$$dQ2
000070716 655_4 $$ainfo:eu-repo/semantics/article$$vinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
000070716 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0002-6109-7876$$aAlberti, P.
000070716 700__ $$aAlvarez-Rodriguez, J.
000070716 700__ $$aBlasco, I.
000070716 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0002-8122-0069$$aSanz, A.
000070716 773__ $$g14, 3 (2016), e0604 [13 pp]$$pSpan. j. agric. res.$$tSpanish Journal of Agricultural Research$$x1695-971X
000070716 8564_ $$s139421$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/70716/files/texto_completo.pdf$$yVersión publicada
000070716 8564_ $$s117819$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/70716/files/texto_completo.jpg?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yVersión publicada
000070716 909CO $$ooai:zaguan.unizar.es:70716$$particulos$$pdriver
000070716 951__ $$a2020-11-05-08:19:39
000070716 980__ $$aARTICLE