000070930 001__ 70930
000070930 005__ 20191127155457.0
000070930 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1017/S0950268818000754
000070930 0248_ $$2sideral$$a106493
000070930 037__ $$aART-2018-106493
000070930 041__ $$aeng
000070930 100__ $$aSánchez-Vizcaíno, F.
000070930 245__ $$aUse of vaccines and factors associated with their uptake variability in dogs, cats and rabbits attending a large sentinel network of veterinary practices across Great Britain
000070930 260__ $$c2018
000070930 5060_ $$aAccess copy available to the general public$$fUnrestricted
000070930 5203_ $$aVaccination remains a mainstay of companion animal population health. However, how vaccine use at a population level complies with existing guidelines is unknown. Here we use electronic health records to describe vaccination in dogs, cats and rabbits attending a large sentinel network of UK veterinary practices. In total, 77.9% (95% CI: 77.6-78.1) of animals had recorded vaccinations. The percentage of animals with recorded vaccinations was higher in dogs, neutered animals, in insured dogs and cats and in purebred dogs. Vaccination rates varied in different regions of Great Britain in all species. Dogs and cats belonging to owners living in less deprived areas of England and Scotland were more likely to be recorded as vaccinated. In the vaccinated population, cats received more core vaccines per year of life (0.86) than dogs (0.75), with feline leukaemia vaccines almost as frequent as core vaccines. In dogs, leptospira vaccines were more frequent than core vaccines. This descriptive study suggests a substantial proportion of animals are not benefiting from vaccine protection. For the first time, we identify potential factors associated with variations in recorded vaccination frequency, providing a critical baseline against which to monitor future changes in companion animal vaccination and evidence to inform future targeted health interventions.
000070930 540__ $$9info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess$$aby$$uhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/
000070930 590__ $$a2.047$$b2018
000070930 591__ $$aPUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH$$b85 / 185 = 0.459$$c2018$$dQ2$$eT2
000070930 591__ $$aINFECTIOUS DISEASES$$b65 / 89 = 0.73$$c2018$$dQ3$$eT3
000070930 592__ $$a1.093$$b2018
000070930 593__ $$aInfectious Diseases$$c2018$$dQ2
000070930 593__ $$aEpidemiology$$c2018$$dQ2
000070930 655_4 $$ainfo:eu-repo/semantics/article$$vinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
000070930 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0003-3074-5778$$aMuniesa, A.$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000070930 700__ $$aSingleton, D.A.
000070930 700__ $$aJones, P.H.
000070930 700__ $$aNoble, P.J.
000070930 700__ $$aGaskell, R.M.
000070930 700__ $$aDawson, S.
000070930 700__ $$aRadford, A.D.
000070930 7102_ $$11009$$2773$$aUniversidad de Zaragoza$$bDpto. Patología Animal$$cÁrea Sanidad Animal
000070930 773__ $$g146, 7 (2018), 895-903$$pEpidemiol. infect.$$tEpidemiology and Infection$$x0950-2688
000070930 8564_ $$s396090$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/70930/files/texto_completo.pdf$$yVersión publicada
000070930 8564_ $$s123613$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/70930/files/texto_completo.jpg?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yVersión publicada
000070930 909CO $$ooai:zaguan.unizar.es:70930$$particulos$$pdriver
000070930 951__ $$a2019-11-27-15:48:34
000070930 980__ $$aARTICLE