000074872 001__ 74872 000074872 005__ 20190709135703.0 000074872 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1016/j.tecto.2017.09.002 000074872 0248_ $$2sideral$$a103552 000074872 037__ $$aART-2017-103552 000074872 041__ $$aeng 000074872 100__ $$aAlçiçek, M.C. 000074872 245__ $$aComment on “First records of syn-diagenetic non-tectonic folding in Quaternary thermogene travertines caused by hydrothermal incremental veining” by Billi et al. Tectonophysics 700–701 (2017) 60–79 000074872 260__ $$c2017 000074872 5060_ $$aAccess copy available to the general public$$fUnrestricted 000074872 5203_ $$aBilli et al. (2017) proposed a new interpretation for the origin and internal structure of thermogene travertine deposits. On the basis of evidence from two quarries located in southern Tuscany (Italy), they interpreted some travertine beds as calcite veins and argued that undulating travertine beds formed by syn-diagenetic (i.e. non-tectonic) folding that was caused by laterally-confined volume expansion caused by incremental veining. They assumed that such a process causes changes to the rock properties, including porosity reduction, rock strengthening, and age rejuvenation. The interpretations by Billi et al. (2017) challenge and question the current understanding and interpretation of thermogene travertine deposits. This understanding, based on numerous studies since the 1980s, is that these deposits form from thermal water flowing downslope, and precipitating calcium carbonate. Here, we explain how the comparison with active depositional systems is essential for the understanding the origin of structures in older, inactive travertine deposits, such as those studied by Billi et al. (2017). We further argue that the three-dimensional setting of travertine deposits should be taken into account in order to discuss the possible development of secondary structures. Indeed travertine deposition on slopes typically leads to the formation of terraced morphologies with pools bordered by rounded rims and separated from each other by steep walls. The resulting three-dimensional structures can be misinterpreted as asymmetric folds in two-dimensional views (i.e., in saw-cut walls of quarry). In this paper we debate the interpretations offered by Billi et al. (2017) and their criteria to recognise syn-diagenetic, non-tectonic folds in travertine deposits, and explain why many of their ideas are questionable. 000074872 540__ $$9info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess$$aby-nc-nd$$uhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/ 000074872 590__ $$a2.686$$b2017 000074872 591__ $$aGEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS$$b32 / 85 = 0.376$$c2017$$dQ2$$eT2 000074872 592__ $$a1.611$$b2017 000074872 593__ $$aGeophysics$$c2017$$dQ1 000074872 593__ $$aEarth-Surface Processes$$c2017$$dQ1 000074872 655_4 $$ainfo:eu-repo/semantics/article$$vinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion 000074872 700__ $$aAlçiçek, H. 000074872 700__ $$aAltunel, E. 000074872 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0002-4212-0524$$aArenas, C.$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza 000074872 700__ $$aBons, P. 000074872 700__ $$aBrogi, A. 000074872 700__ $$aCapezzuoli, E. 000074872 700__ $$ade Riese, T. 000074872 700__ $$aPorta, G.D. 000074872 700__ $$aGandin, A. 000074872 700__ $$aGuo, L. 000074872 700__ $$aJones, B. 000074872 700__ $$aKarabacak, V. 000074872 700__ $$aKershaw, S. 000074872 700__ $$aLiotta, D. 000074872 700__ $$aMindszenty, A. 000074872 700__ $$aPedley, M. 000074872 700__ $$aRonchi, P. 000074872 700__ $$aSwennen, R. 000074872 700__ $$aTemiz, U. 000074872 7102_ $$12000$$2280$$aUniversidad de Zaragoza$$bDpto. Ciencias de la Tierra$$cÁrea Estratigrafía 000074872 773__ $$g721 (2017), 491-500$$pTectonophysics$$tTECTONOPHYSICS$$x0040-1951 000074872 8564_ $$s1635732$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/74872/files/texto_completo.pdf$$yPostprint 000074872 8564_ $$s91016$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/74872/files/texto_completo.jpg?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yPostprint 000074872 909CO $$ooai:zaguan.unizar.es:74872$$particulos$$pdriver 000074872 951__ $$a2019-07-09-12:50:54 000074872 980__ $$aARTICLE