Cardiometabolic risk through an integrative classification combining physical activity and sedentary behavior in European adolescents: HELENA study
Financiación FP6 / FP6 Funds
Resumen: Purpose: This study aims to compare adolescents’ cardiometabolic risk score through an integrative classification of physical activity (PA), which involves the combination of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) and sedentary behavior (SB).
Methods: A cross-sectional study derived from the Healthy Lifestyle in Europe by Nutrition in Adolescence Cross-Sectional Study database (2006–2008) was conducted in adolescents (n = 548; boys, 47.3%; 14.7 ± 1.2 years) from 10 European cities. MVPA and SB were objectively measured using accelerometry. Adolescents were divided into 4 categories according to MVPA (meeting or not meeting the international recommendations) and the median of SB time (above or below sex- and age-specific median) as follows: High-SB & Inactive, Low-SB & Inactive, High-SB & Active, and Low-SB & Active. A clustered cardiometabolic risk score was computed using the homeostatic model assessment, systolic blood pressure, triglycerides, total cholesterol/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, sum 4 skinfolds, and cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF). Analyses of covariance were performed to discern differences on cardiometabolic risk scores among PA categories and each health component.
Results: The cardiometabolic risk score was lower in adolescents meeting the MVPA recommendation and with less time spent in SB in comparison to the high-SB & inactive group (p < 0.05). However, no difference in cardiometabolic risk score was established between high-SB or low-SB groups in inactive adolescents. It is important to note that CRF was the only variable that showed a significant modification (higher) when children were compared from the category of physically inactive with “active” but not from high-to low-SB.
Conclusion: Being physically active is the most significant and protective outcome in adolescents to reduce cardiometabolic risk. Lower SB does not exhibit a significant and extra beneficial difference.

Idioma: Inglés
DOI: 10.1016/j.jshs.2018.03.004
Año: 2018
Publicado en: Journal of Sport and Health Science 8, 1 (2018), 55 - 62
ISSN: 2095-2546

Factor impacto JCR: 3.644 (2018)
Categ. JCR: SPORT SCIENCES rank: 10 / 83 = 0.12 (2018) - Q1 - T1
Categ. JCR: HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM rank: 8 / 52 = 0.154 (2018) - Q1 - T1

Factor impacto SCIMAGO: 0.98 - Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (Q1) - Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (Q1)

Financiación: info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EUR/FP6/FOOD-CT-2005-007034
Financiación: info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/MINECO/RYC-2010-05957
Financiación: info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/MINECO/RYC-2011-09011
Financiación: info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/Spanish Ministry of Health/RD08-0072
Financiación: info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/Spanish Ministry of Health/RD16-0022
Tipo y forma: Article (Published version)
Área (Departamento): Área Enfermería (Dpto. Fisiatría y Enfermería)
Área (Departamento): Área Educación Física y Depor. (Dpto. Fisiatría y Enfermería)


Creative Commons You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. You may not use the material for commercial purposes. If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.


Exportado de SIDERAL (2023-08-30-10:57:42)


Visitas y descargas

Este artículo se encuentra en las siguientes colecciones:
Articles



 Record created 2018-10-18, last modified 2023-08-30


Versión publicada:
 PDF
Rate this document:

Rate this document:
1
2
3
 
(Not yet reviewed)