<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection>
<dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:invenio="http://invenio-software.org/elements/1.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><dc:identifier>doi:10.1249/01.mss.0000487965.17864.98</dc:identifier><dc:language>eng</dc:language><dc:creator>Matute-Llorente, A.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Lozano-Berges, G.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Gomez-Bruton, A.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Gomez-Cabello, A.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Gonzalez-Aguero, A.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Vicente-Rodriguez, G.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Casajus, J.A.</dc:creator><dc:title>Comparison Of Body Composition Methods For The Assessment Of Body Fat In Adolescent Soccer Players</dc:title><dc:identifier>ART-2016-106184</dc:identifier><dc:description>Anthropometry, dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and air displacement plethysmography (ADP) are widely used for assessing body fat percentage (%BF). The accuracy among body composition methods in different kind of populations such as children, adults, obese persons, and athletes has been studied but there are some discrepancies between them.
PURPOSE: To compare %BF assessed by DXA, ADP and anthropometry in adolescent soccer players.
METHODS: %BF was assessed in ninety-two soccer players (64 males, 13.3 ± 0.5 y; 28 females, 13.3 ± 0.6 y) by anthropometry, DXA and ADP. Anthropometry measurements were registered following the recommendations of the ISAK. Anthropometry %BF was calculated using the equation proposed by Slaughter et al for adolescents. ADP %BF was calculated with 3 different formulas: (i) the general Siri equation (ADPSiri); (ii) the age- and sex-specific equation by Lohman (ADPLohman) and (iii) the age- and sex-specific equation by Silva (ADPSilva). Agreement and differences between methods were assessed by two-paired samples t tests and calculating the 95% limits of agreement.
RESULTS: In the whole sample, ADPSiri ADPLohman ADPSilva and anthropometry underestimated %BF by 2.0, 6.9, 6.2, and 6.0% respectively compared to DXA (all p&lt;0.05). The 95% limits of agreement ranged from ±5.91% to ±10.78%. Similar results dividing by sex were found.
CONCLUSION: Although the 3 used methodologies have been several times described as valid for the assessment of %BF, based in our data it seems that ADP, anthropometry and DXA are not interchangeable for the assessment of %BF in adolescent soccer players.</dc:description><dc:date>2016</dc:date><dc:source>http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/75636</dc:source><dc:doi>10.1249/01.mss.0000487965.17864.98</dc:doi><dc:identifier>http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/75636</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>oai:zaguan.unizar.es:75636</dc:identifier><dc:relation>info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/MEC/AP-2012-02854</dc:relation><dc:relation>info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/MINECO/DEP2012-32724</dc:relation><dc:identifier.citation>MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE 48, 5 (2016), 986-987</dc:identifier.citation><dc:rights>All rights reserved</dc:rights><dc:rights>http://www.europeana.eu/rights/rr-f/</dc:rights><dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights></dc:dc>

</collection>