000075796 001__ 75796
000075796 005__ 20200117221657.0
000075796 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1071/AN16425
000075796 0248_ $$2sideral$$a107491
000075796 037__ $$aART-2018-107491
000075796 041__ $$aeng
000075796 100__ $$0(orcid)0000-0001-8932-4615$$aAmanzougarene, Z$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000075796 245__ $$aIn vitro acidification potential and fermentation pattern of cereal grains incubated with inoculum from animals given forage or concentrate based diets
000075796 260__ $$c2018
000075796 5060_ $$aAccess copy available to the general public$$fUnrestricted
000075796 5203_ $$aThis work aimed to study the acidification and fermentation pattern of maize (M1, M2, M3), barley (B1, B2, B3) and sorghum (S1, S2, S3) varieties depending on the rumen environment (inoculum from forage or concentrate diets, FI or CI), in 10 h incubation series with a low buffered medium. With CI, gas volume from barley was similar to maize (P > 0.05) except at 4 and 6 h, when M2 and M1 were lower. Barley or maize varieties did not differ in gas production (P > 0.05). After 10 h, barley and maize produced on average 82.5 and 73.0 mL/g organic matter (OM), whereas S1, S2 and S3 rendered 68.4, 31.1 and 39.7 mL/g. With FI, differences between barley and maize were detected after 6 h (61.0, 35.3 and 14.1 mL/g OM at 10 h for barley, maize and sorghum). Among inocula, pH with CI was lower than with FI (P < 0.001). Incubation pH at 10 h was 5.51, 5.21 and 5.00 with CI, and 5.52, 5.85 and 5.91 with FI, for sorghum, maize and barley varieties. Gas production and total volatile fatty acid (VFA) concentration were higher (P < 0.001) with CI than FI (67.3 vs 36.8 mL/g and 31.0 vs 19.9 mmol/L at 10 and 8 h). Butyrate and valerate proportions were higher with CI (P < 0.001), whereas acetate and branched chain VFA were lower (P < 0.001). Fermentative activity against vitreous starch such as maize or sorghum was lower for forage than concentrate inoculum. Study of fermentation of starch-rich substrates in a low buffered medium gives a more realistic picture than conventionally buffered conditions.
000075796 536__ $$9info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/MICINN/AGL2013-46820
000075796 540__ $$9info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess$$aAll rights reserved$$uhttp://www.europeana.eu/rights/rr-f/
000075796 590__ $$a1.275$$b2018
000075796 591__ $$aAGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE$$b26 / 61 = 0.426$$c2018$$dQ2$$eT2
000075796 592__ $$a0.631$$b2018
000075796 593__ $$aFood Science$$c2018$$dQ2
000075796 593__ $$aAnimal Science and Zoology$$c2018$$dQ2
000075796 655_4 $$ainfo:eu-repo/semantics/article$$vinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
000075796 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0003-3927-9793$$aYuste, S.$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000075796 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0002-9282-7974$$aCastrillo, C.$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000075796 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0002-0712-1185$$aFondevila, M.$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000075796 7102_ $$12008$$2700$$aUniversidad de Zaragoza$$bDpto. Produc.Animal Cienc.Ali.$$cÁrea Producción Animal
000075796 773__ $$g57, 12 (2018), 2300-2307$$pAnim. Prod. Sci.$$tANIMAL PRODUCTION SCIENCE$$x1836-0939
000075796 8564_ $$s321307$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/75796/files/texto_completo.pdf$$yPostprint
000075796 8564_ $$s75051$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/75796/files/texto_completo.jpg?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yPostprint
000075796 909CO $$ooai:zaguan.unizar.es:75796$$particulos$$pdriver
000075796 951__ $$a2020-01-17-22:11:43
000075796 980__ $$aARTICLE