000076937 001__ 76937
000076937 005__ 20230111103822.0
000076937 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.11.017
000076937 0248_ $$2sideral$$a109705
000076937 037__ $$aART-2019-109705
000076937 041__ $$aeng
000076937 100__ $$aCampos, P.
000076937 245__ $$aBridging the Gap Between National and Ecosystem Accounting Application in Andalusian Forests, Spain
000076937 260__ $$c2019
000076937 5060_ $$aAccess copy available to the general public$$fUnrestricted
000076937 5203_ $$aNational accounting either ignores or fails to give due values to the ecosystem services, products, incomes and environmental assets of a country. To overcome these shortcomings, we apply spatially-explicit extended accounts that incorporate a novel environmental income indicator, which we test in the forests of Andalusia (Spain). Extended accounts incorporate nine farmer activities (timber, cork, firewood, nuts, livestock grazing, conservation forestry, hunting, residential services and private amenity) and seven government activities (fire services, free access recreation, free access mushroom, carbon, landscape conservation, threatened biodiversity and water yield). To make sure the valuation remains consistent with standard accounts, we simulate exchange values for non-market final forest product consumption in order to measure individual ecosystem services and environmental income indicators. Manufactured capital and environmental assets are also integrated. When comparing extended to standard accounts, our results are 3.6 times higher for gross value added. These differences are explained primarily by the omission in the standard accounts of carbon activities and undervaluation of private amenity, free access recreation, landscape and threatened biodiversity ecosystem services. Extended accounts measure a value of Andalusian forest ecosystem services 5.4 times higher than that measured using the valuation criteria of standard accounts.
000076937 540__ $$9info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess$$aby-nc-nd$$uhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/
000076937 590__ $$a4.482$$b2019
000076937 592__ $$a1.719$$b2019
000076937 591__ $$aECOLOGY$$b26 / 168 = 0.155$$c2019$$dQ1$$eT1
000076937 593__ $$aEnvironmental Science (miscellaneous)$$c2019$$dQ1
000076937 591__ $$aENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES$$b20 / 123 = 0.163$$c2019$$dQ1$$eT1
000076937 593__ $$aEconomics and Econometrics$$c2019$$dQ1
000076937 591__ $$aECONOMICS$$b26 / 371 = 0.07$$c2019$$dQ1$$eT1
000076937 591__ $$aENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES$$b53 / 265 = 0.2$$c2019$$dQ1$$eT1
000076937 655_4 $$ainfo:eu-repo/semantics/article$$vinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
000076937 700__ $$aCaparrós, A.
000076937 700__ $$aOviedo, J.L.
000076937 700__ $$aOvando, P.
000076937 700__ $$aÁlvarez-Farizo, B.
000076937 700__ $$aDíaz-Balteiro, L.
000076937 700__ $$aCarranza, J.
000076937 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0002-3974-2947$$aBeguería, S.
000076937 700__ $$aDíaz, M.
000076937 700__ $$aHerruzo, A.C.
000076937 700__ $$aMartínez-Peña, F.
000076937 700__ $$aSoliño, M.
000076937 700__ $$aÁlvarez, A.
000076937 700__ $$aMartínez-Jauregui, M.
000076937 700__ $$aPasalodos-Tato, M.
000076937 700__ $$ade Frutos, P.
000076937 700__ $$aAldea, J.
000076937 700__ $$aAlmazán, E.
000076937 700__ $$aConcepción, E.D.
000076937 700__ $$aMesa, B.
000076937 700__ $$aRomero, C.
000076937 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0001-7663-1202$$aSerrano-Notivoli, R.$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000076937 700__ $$aFernández, C.
000076937 700__ $$aTorres-Porras, J.
000076937 700__ $$aMontero, G.
000076937 7102_ $$13006$$2010$$aUniversidad de Zaragoza$$bDpto. Geograf. Ordenac.Territ.$$cÁrea Análisis Geográfico Regi.
000076937 773__ $$g157 (2019), 218-236$$pEcol. econ.$$tECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS$$x0921-8009
000076937 8564_ $$s1296193$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/76937/files/texto_completo.pdf$$yVersión publicada
000076937 8564_ $$s89382$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/76937/files/texto_completo.jpg?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yVersión publicada
000076937 909CO $$ooai:zaguan.unizar.es:76937$$particulos$$pdriver
000076937 951__ $$a2023-01-11-10:06:22
000076937 980__ $$aARTICLE