<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection>
<dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:invenio="http://invenio-software.org/elements/1.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><dc:identifier>doi:10.3390/rs10122061</dc:identifier><dc:language>eng</dc:language><dc:creator>Melendo-Vega, J.R.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Martín, M.P.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Pacheco-Labrador, J.</dc:creator><dc:creator>González-Cascón, R.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Moreno, G.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Pérez, F.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Migliavacca, M.</dc:creator><dc:creator>García, M.</dc:creator><dc:creator>North, P.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Riaño, D.</dc:creator><dc:title>Improving the performance of 3-D radiative transfer model FLIGHT to simulate optical properties of a tree-grass ecosystem</dc:title><dc:identifier>ART-2018-109864</dc:identifier><dc:description>The 3-D Radiative Transfer Model (RTM) FLIGHT can represent scattering in open forest or savannas featuring underlying bare soils. However, FLIGHT might not be suitable for multilayered tree-grass ecosystems (TGE), where a grass understory can dominate the reflectance factor (RF) dynamics due to strong seasonal variability and low tree fractional cover. To address this issue, we coupled FLIGHT with the 1-D RTM PROSAIL. The model is evaluated against spectral observations of proximal and remote sensing sensors: the ASD Fieldspec® 3 spectroradiometer, the Airborne Spectrographic Imager (CASI) and the MultiSpectral Instrument (MSI) onboard Sentinel- 2. We tested the capability of both PROSAIL and PROSAIL+FLIGHT to reproduce the variability of different phenological stages determined by 16-year time series analysis of Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer-Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (MODIS-NDVI). Then, we combined concomitant observations of biophysical variables and RF to test the capability of the models to reproduce observed RF. PROSAIL achieved a Relative Root Mean Square Error (RRMSE) between 6% to 32% at proximal sensing scale. PROSAIL+FLIGHT RRMSE ranged between 7% to 31% at remote sensing scales. RRMSE increased in periods when large fractions of standing dead material mixed with emergent green grasses -especially in autumn-; suggesting that the model cannot represent the spectral features of this material. PROSAIL+FLIGHT improves RF simulation especially in summer and at mid-high view angles.</dc:description><dc:date>2018</dc:date><dc:source>http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/76973</dc:source><dc:doi>10.3390/rs10122061</dc:doi><dc:identifier>http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/76973</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>oai:zaguan.unizar.es:76973</dc:identifier><dc:relation>info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/MINECO/CGL2015-G9095-R</dc:relation><dc:relation>info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/MINECO/CGL2012-34383</dc:relation><dc:relation>info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/MEC/FPU15-03558</dc:relation><dc:identifier.citation>Remote Sensing 10, 12 (2018), 2061 [33 pp]</dc:identifier.citation><dc:rights>by</dc:rights><dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/</dc:rights><dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights></dc:dc>

</collection>